This is an oft repeated trope: that Republican administrations are better for the economy then Democrat administrations. Is that true? A simple Web search for “are republican or democratic presidents better for the economy?” returns consistent results saying that it isn’t. Personally, I think there are many factors more important than who sits in the White House. But I didn’t bring it up.
The most common Democratic rebuttal to “Trump has built a great economy!” is “…by taking over a pretty great one from Obama.” Either the President has a great deal of influence over the economy, or he doesn’t. Which is it?
That’s terrible. I’m glad I voted against Obama twice. So is it better or worse for you when one percenters get even more filthy rich under Obama or Trump? For me it’s worse now just because so many more people are unemployed and getting evicted while the 1% profit.
A. I am a one percenter on income, not wealth, so you understand my bias.
B. How much someone else makes is irrelevant.
C. The stock market is not the only measure of a healthy economy and even less so when it’s being propped up by the fed.