Well no duh it is worse, Now that Antifa knows the names someone going to get a milkshake thrown at them.
Of course not, nor would it be as bad as publicizing a list of democratic donors under the guise of people who support those “criminals” “rapists” or “invaders”…as I’m sure you can see the potential issue with that.
Don’t be conflicted. Break the cycle. The last thing we should is normalize the sociopath’s behavior by lowering ourselves to his level.
I think you have a valid point in how this was done.
I agree that it’s poor form and shouldn’t be done in that way. It’d be legitimate to publicize supporters of the President, but the language is a bit much.
I find it chuckleworthy that some folks will come at this thing tut-tutting when previously they they defended “wanted” posters of women’s health providers or “surveying reticles” on Sarah Palin marketing collateral.
Just so I get this straight, there is a public list of donors available that categorizes individuals under descriptions such as those that “fuel a campaign of hate”?
I’d like to see that public information.
I’m well aware of Open Secrets but I couldn’t find on the website where it identified that “contributions are fueling a campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as ‘invaders.”
And just yesterday you and I had an agreeable exchange about turning down the heat on this kind of rhetoric. Oh well.
I’m not condoning his tweet. My only point is that campaign contributions are public record.
Just so I get this straight, there is a public list of donors available that categorizes individuals under descriptions such as those that “fuel a campaign of hate”?
I’d like to see that public information.
So it’s the scary descriptor words that have upset you, not the release of the donor’s names?
Here’s a list of all of Elizabeth Warren’s donors in Texas. Watch me “publicize” them.
I’m well aware of Open Secrets but I couldn’t find on the website where it identified that “contributions are fueling a campaign of hate that labels Hispanic immigrants as ‘invaders.”
Sorry, we’re past that. You guys don’t get to clutch your pearls over rhetoric anymore.
Publicize it describing her a stinking socialist.
Sure.
Here’s a list of everyone in Texas who donated to that STINKING SOCIALIST Elizabeth Warren.
Donor Lookup
I heard those guys worship Satan…
I think you have a valid point in how this was done.
Thank you.
Unfortunately, it’s done now and will likely be used as an excuse in the event the favor is ever repaid…just as Trump’s idiocy has been used as an excuse for this.
…cause that’s how we do politics in these here parts.
I heard those guys worship Satan…
Damn heathens.
There’s an old saying. “Wrestle with the pigs, you’re going to end up getting covered in mud.” Or something fairly close to that. Probably why most reasonable people don’t seek to go into politics to begin with. Most of the politicians are pigs.
That was my first thought as well.
So it’s the scary descriptor words that have upset you, not the release of the donor’s names?
Here’s a list of all of Elizabeth Warren’s donors in Texas. Watch me “publicize” them.
Yes, scary descriptor words…like “rapists” “criminals” or “invader”. From what I’ve gathered over the last few days here, those descriptor words mean something and tend to have reall consequences.
But, I’m sure in this case it’s somehow different…at least in your mind.
Color me entirely unsurprised.
Yes, scary descriptor words…like “rapists” “criminals” or “invader”. From what I’ve gathered over the last few days here, those descriptor words mean something and tend to have reall consequences.
But, I’m sure in this case it’s somehow different…at least in your mind.
So… this is the same, in your mind?