LOL absolutely agree. It was bizarre watching this unfold in real time. I am no legal eagle but as I watched the livestream I was bewildered as to why they thought this testimony would help them.
I was being a bit sarcastic as the main point is that now we know laws can be perfectly abided by (legal form) BUT sadly in substance can possibly fall short of the mark as it relates to signature verification really be accomplished. Hopefully STATE legislators across America will adapt their election counting laws going forward to get better check and balancesā¦
Whether or not Lake ultimately appeals to the Arizona Supreme Court is far less important than Stateās taking note.
I am sort of astonished how there is not more guidance in the prevailing Maricopa statutes already. If Arizona ever gets around to enacting an amendment I hope they in addition to mandating a minimum amount of time to review each ballot, like for example, 5 Seconds, the employee must going forward also pause and do some type of āmeaningfulā check that can be cross checked tooā¦ Without more specifics there could be abuses like for instance employees making the focus being more of a timekeeper only. So instead of working the ballot they could conceivably completely ignore their computer screen for even 10+seconds and then click it OK. While that technically would do the trick in abiding to the law it falls short in substance of truly making an earnest attempt to vet
the signature on each ballot to the one on the rolls. In the bigger picture surely the shortcomings within Maricopa could turn out to be a blessing in disguise where many States take this as lessons learned including firming up more their own shops up to and including maybe enhancing their own statutes in this regard.
This is an excellent article that does a good job of summarizing why Lake failed again to prove her case.
The question I have is why did she retain the services of lawyers with no experience in Arizona electoral law or electoral fraud. The cynic in me thinks she got the cheapest possible legal team so she would have access to as much cash as possible from her supporters who donated to her legal fight.
Little early, they canāt start the process for 6 months after the individual assumes office. Only then can they apply for a statement of organization and the collection of signatures.
Money well spent. Ever hear the idiom
ā like watching sausages getting madeā?
Lakeās lawyers managed to get it on the official record for the Republic to see. Namely the unpleasant truths about how Maricopa gets it count done is shameful. May be legal but probably much like if people watched sausages getting made, many would vomit.