incompetence yes. corruption no.
Allan
incompetence yes. corruption no.
Allan
0.000000001%
you have a better chance of hitting the powerball.
Allan
Youāre not talking about epistemology in general.
You are promoting solipsism.
And Iām not surprised that you areā¦espousing that allows you to believe in lots of things that arenāt reality
Hearings scheduled for today before the Court.
Should be able to follow the hearing via live stream. Starts at 09:00AM AZ time (11:00 EST).
I hope to catch it but my wife has designated this as a āworkā day around the house to clean up and get ready for Christmas. So not sure.
Or I guess some people can just wait for the 5-minute talking head point of view focused on the CT aspects instead of actually listening to what is presented in court.
WW
Whatever the outcome, social media, likely at the behest of our intel agencies put their thumb on the scale of this election. Example, youtube removing the Tim Pool interview of Lake just prior to the election.
Whatever the outcome, social media, likely at the behest of our intel agencies put their thumb on the scale of this election. Example, youtube removing the Tim Pool interview of Lake just prior to the election.
There you go!
You keep doing you!
PS I canāt even find a reference to what you are talking about using DuckDuckGo, so perhaps you can provide a link?
Nemesis:Interesting. I am not a legal expert so not sure why they did that. What should we infer from that?
hobbs had nothing to do with the two issues at hand.
Allan
So why even include her and ask she testify? Ha I know you dont know why Lakes legal team did that but it makes no sense to me.
You are promoting solipsism.
No I am not.
zantax:Whatever the outcome, social media, likely at the behest of our intel agencies put their thumb on the scale of this election. Example, youtube removing the Tim Pool interview of Lake just prior to the election.
There you go!
You keep doing you!
PS I canāt even find a reference to what you are talking about using DuckDuckGo, so perhaps you can provide a link?
My bad, it was a Crowder interview. Even bigger audience. And thanks, I will keep doing me, you know, thinking for myself and doing my own research.
JayJay:You are promoting solipsism.
No I am not.
Nothing in epistemology supports your ludicrous position so you kinda are though only kinda.
Nothing in epistemology supports your ludicrous position so you kinda are though only kinda.
You tell me. In the tenth century, did people know the earth was flat? Or did they believe without doubt that the world was flat? Or both?
FreeAndClear:Nothing in epistemology supports your ludicrous position so you kinda are though only kinda.
You tell me. In the tenth century, did people know the earth was flat? Or did they believe without doubt that the world was flat? Or both?
Again knowedlege can be based in faith but not all knowledge is based in faith. Thatās ludicrous.
We keep going in circles because something so basic canāt be admitted - observational knowledge can be based in faith and it can be based in personal observation. Both statements are true.
Paul_Thomson:You tell me. In the tenth century, did people know the earth was flat? Or did they believe without doubt that the world was flat? Or both?
Again knowedlege can be based in faith but not all knowledge is based in faith. Thatās ludicrous.
We keep going in circles because something so basic canāt be admitted - observational knowledge can be based in faith and it can be based in personal observation. Both statements are true.
Did you answer my question? Was that an agreement that both were true? People knew the earth was flat AND they believed without doubt that the earth was flat.
incompetence yes. corruption no.
You say potata I say po-ta-tas
FreeAndClear: Paul_Thomson:You tell me. In the tenth century, did people know the earth was flat? Or did they believe without doubt that the world was flat? Or both?
Again knowedlege can be based in faith but not all knowledge is based in faith. Thatās ludicrous.
We keep going in circles because something so basic canāt be admitted - observational knowledge can be based in faith and it can be based in personal observation. Both statements are true.
Did you answer my question? Was that an agreement that both were true? People knew the earth was flat AND they believed without doubt that the earth was flat.
I said both are true form the start. Not all knowledge is based in faith but it can be.
Earth is flat is different from i saw someone going into the ocean. I cooked a meal today. President trump was the 45th president.
Earth is flat is different from i saw someone going into the ocean. I cooked a meal today. President trump was the 45th president.
In what way are they different. They are all conclusions based on observation one believes they are reliably inerpreting.
FreeAndClear:Earth is flat is different from i saw someone going into the ocean. I cooked a meal today. President trump was the 45th president.
In what way are they different. They are all conclusions based on observation one believes they are reliably inerpreting.
You are philosophizing unnecessarily in order to conclude that if all knowledge is based in belief then anything can be true as long as one believes it. Thatās not how any of this works.
It allows you to subvert reality and replace it with feelings. Weird way to go through life.
You are philosophizing unnecessarily in order to conclude that if all knowledge is based in belief then anything can be true as long as one believes it. Thatās not how any of this works.
No. I have not said that nor implied it. Cite my words to that effect. I have indicated that what people know (believe without doubt) can be untrue.
FreeAndClear:You are philosophizing unnecessarily in order to conclude that if all knowledge is based in belief then anything can be true as long as one believes it. Thatās not how any of this works.
No. I have not said that nor implied it. Cite my words to that effect. I have indicated that what people know (believe without doubt) can be untrue.
Thatās the only logical outcome of your line that āall knowledge is faith basedā