Most people didn’t think about it.
Hose that did knew the earth was round.
You don’t “do your own research”…you listen to what’s spoon fed you.
I guarantee you have zero idea how Arizona elections work, and so once again have zero understanding as to why Lake’s assertions are practically impossible.
(Yes I do know how Arizona’s elections work…because unlike most, when I “do my research”, I research the things that actually pertain to the questions at hand. Knowing how things work is always critical to know…because when you don’t know how things work…you believe anything is possible).
Yes we know, you are the smartest guy in the room.
No I just know not to get my information second and third hand from people in media with an agenda.
All this because I pointed out it was still being adjudicated lol. Who spoon fed that to me do ya think?
No that’s not all this is about.
This follows on my comment that the odds of the adjudication resulting in the remedy of a win for Lake or an election do over were close to zero.
After such hemming and hawing you of course backtracked to the RW’s favorite thing now…,the thing they laughed at Hillary supporters for saying back in 2016…that social media bias cost Lake votes.
Lol!
“They took Crowder’s interview of Lake off YouTube! No fair!”
Because it is unfair election tampering.
1 Like
Lake lost because she explicitly told Arizonans who had voted for McCain to ■■■■ off and not vote for her and it cost her the race just like Trump’s dumb anti McCain bias even after his death cost him the EVs.
Also, her former career consisted of having to dress professionally and stylishly, so you have to realize she’s playing to the rubes with her gold sequined suit that Cher circa 1974 would be embarrassed to wear.
2 Likes
it appears the Kari Lake team isn’t having a good day in court today.
Lmao for real here. And i thought I was the only one who noticed that. LOL.
She’s wearing a gold sequined suit?
An expert witness shared information that could very well show intent to defraud. As I’m going throughout my day, I stopped for a second and this came up. Let’s see where it goes?
1 Like
Perhaps you didn’t catch the part where the Lawyer for the State tore his testimony apart. The guy tried to say that because some ballots could not be read by the tabulation system they were not tabulated. The State made the case that there was a workaround the tabulation machine and indeed those ballots were tabulated and the vote properly counted. In addition the expert witness had to testify that he was being paid by a pro-Trump organization just like he was paid for his talk that he gave at Mike Lindell’s weekend conference.
unpossible. the YouTube said he was an expert.
2 Likes
And the expert had all of his expenses paid and was being paid $250.00 per hour for his time. Nice gig if you can get one.
2 Likes
This past half hour prior to break was pretty compelling testimony on concerns of lacking transparency on Maricopa’s part. Lake attorney was discussing the 275,000 mail in ballots (exhibits 63/70) possibly coming into Maricopa via unconventional means. For example, dropped off from residents outside of formal drop boxes or precincts directly. Then Maricopa recorder Steven Richer sends a tweet two days after Election his reconciliation is off 15,000 mail in votes from precinct reports submitted.
2 Likes
Actually, $250 is pretty low for a good expert witness. I bill at $300 and that’s toward the low end because I haven’t done it much.
2 Likes
Why did you link what somebody else on YouTube said the “expert” said, when WorldWatcher provided a link to the live feed from the courtroom itself?
Aren’t you a Truth Seeker who thinks for himself?
3 Likes
Doing his own research.
