There’s pretty much nothing a Democratic candidate can do or did or said in the past that is worse than the sociopath we currently have in White House.
Did he pay off a porn whore?
Conservatives calling out Democrats on gaffes, and some minor family issues after supporting this person in the White House?
Lolololol!!!
There is pretty much everything that they can do that is worse than what you call a sociopath. Socialized medicine which would bankrupt medicare for those in medicare now, and give us VA for everybody where people have died for the long wait period. This VA is what caused people to die in Arizona, LA, other places https://www.cnn.com/2014/04/23/health/veterans-dying-health-care-delays/index.html
People dying from waiting for VA, ie socialized medicine, yea that is worse, the way to solve the wait times is giving veterans non-government insurance and care possible, which Trump has done, and Sanders, Harris, others pushing socialized medicine, getting rid of all private insurance and care except for nose jobs or the sort, I’d say that is worse.
I’d also say what is worse is letting thousands of people come into the US illegally every day, bringing in a whole bunch of people who eventually become a part of the welfare state, we have to feed, educate and clothe people who can’t take care of themselves. A candidate who says come on in, because they know they can see future Democrat voters to vote them in perpetually in the future. Bankrupting this country, lowering the wages of the people in the US, and rewarding illegal behavior, having sanctuary cities supposedly but calling it illegal to have them bused there, while thinking it is just fine and legal to have border cities forced to take people in. Make these people legal, don’t call them illegal any more and they should get Social Security. Invite all these unskilled people in, you must take them in with children, so we can sustain them, those children don’t have skills to work, they need to be fed and sustained by the US. You know what, that is worse
I’d also say what is worse is destroying our economy when we emit only 15% emissions and spend 100 Trillion $ for a wacked out green deal, 600,000 per family in the US to destroy our economy in the goal to get rid of cars and airplanes, but still insist on not fracking which is the only reason our emissions have gone down. Fracking is good for the environment but all the Democratic presidential candidates are against its expansion, while they all travel around having a good carbon footprint. Destroying our economy while China is allowed to emit a crazy amount of emissions, while right now they emit double, unless you will want to go to war with China which might be your next step if you want emissions to go down. Yea, I think that is worse.
Worse, cozying up to Iran, trading with them, bowing down to them, and getting sailors captured and bowing down and thanking Iran for kidnapping our sailors and giving them back to us, kissing up to Iran, and giving them 150 billion$ so they can fund the terror that they have since spread. Go back to kissing up to Iran, I’d say that is worse.
You know what, these Democratic candidates can do these type of things, and it is worse than what you call a sociopath in the White House.
You’ve eaten the pablum of Hannity and Limbaugh.
Letting people lose everything because they lose their job and health insurance is worse than a having a system that covers everybody. Many countries have better and cheaper health care systems.
The myth that Democrats want just let in everybody has taken root with far right and its just plain false.
Cozying up to Iran and bowing down? Please. Better to make a deal and have inspectors than have them going full bore into nuclear weapons. BTW how is the sociopath in the White House doing with NK. Could it be called cozying and bowing down?
The monster you support in nothing more than a vicious toddler who thinks of nothing but himself. A completely morally bankrupt piece of garbage who will go down in history as a terrible anomaly in our line of presidents. No, Trump supporters calling out Democrats on moral grounds is nothing short of delusional.
As far as policy goes, the sociopath has none but what he thinks will help him. The wall is not even close to a realistic solution to border, besides lying about who was going to pay for it, he has attempted to corrupt the constitution to pay for it. Imagine a Democratic president declaring a national emergency and unilaterally imposing medicare for all, hmmmmm?
And I notice you seem to mind that his tax cuts are making the deficit skyrocket, while giving the rich huge benefits and the middle class hardly anything.
1 Like
Here’s your answer per Politico:
Not every candidate will be allowed to take the stage in Miami, however. The DNC announced in February that a candidate must receive donations from at least 65,000 donors in at least 20 states and poll at 1 percent or more in at least three polls to qualify for a spot on the debate stage. The randomized debate lineup will contrast the Democratic matchups with the debates hosted by the Republican Party in 2016, when the crowded GOP field was divided into an upper and lower tier based on polling.
The first presidential debate is going to be on June 26th and 27th. Unlike the GOP debates of 2016, it’s not going to be divided into the Senior and Junior sections.
Based on the April polling data, there’s only about 15 or 16 candidates who would be eligible.
Heck, those people losing their lives at VA locations is not Hannity & Limbaugh pablum. That is government health care in the US right now. The links I gave you were not from Hannity & Limbaugh. The VA is horrible right now, only alleviated by being allowed to go to private alternatives. Many Democrats want the VA expanded, practically right now, you will have more people. Me losing my health plan that I had, is not Hannity & Limbaught pablum. the current health plan with having huge increases in premiums and deductibles. Many are officially insured but practically not insured for many. Right now I am well before retirement but in 2009 Obamacare passed, 2010 the company that I had been a part of, am no longer with quit offering retirement health plans for someone in my category, right after Obamacare was offered. Thanks Obama. Where I am now, huge deductibles huge premiums, way worse than what I had before. That is the Health Care that one gets now for many, yea officially insured. Right now Medicare is not sufficient private insurance is necessary to supplement because it is insufficient in and of itself. Many people are only able to survive, only because of getting private insurance, which makes it more affordable. But Sanders and Harris want to get rid of these supplemental plans, which would be devastating. Now in reference to a nationalized health care, we will get, long waiting lines. Oh, lets get cheaper health care, like in UK, where people are going blind, yea cheaper.
If you’re wondering what Democrats have in mind when they tout “Medicare-for-all,” look no further than England. There are more reports of the U.K.’s National Health Service collapse, this time featuring horror stories of rationing care for the elderly. Doctors are now sounding alarm bells that seniors with cataracts are going blind as they wait for surgical approval.
The Guardian reported, “Patients who are losing their sight are being forced to wait for months before having eye cataracts removed because of NHS cost-cutting. … The NHS has imposed restrictions on patients’ access to cataract surgery in more than half of England. … The Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) condemned the rationing as shocking. It warned that not treating people with cloudy vision risks them falling and breaking bones, thus costing the NHS more.”
Last year, The New York Times reported some people in England were waiting for 12 hours to be seen in emergency rooms.
Iran, the deal was a joke, didn’t allow real inspections, can you rationalize sending them 150$ billion so they could spread terror. US inspectors not allowed. No problem for liberals. US inspections not allowed. ‘self inspect’ by Iran was necessary. Ignore US sailors getting captured but thank them.
Before the deal, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei insisted that “inspection of our military sites is out of the question and is one of our red lines.” Foreigners, he elaborated, “shouldn’t be allowed at all to penetrate into the country’s security and defensive boundaries under the pretext of supervision, and the country’s military officials are not permitted at all to allow the foreigners to cross these boundaries or stop the country’s defensive development under the pretext of supervision and inspection.”
While he has remained silent about access since the deal was signed, his proxies have not. On the day the deal was finalized, according to Iran’s Fars news service, the spokesman for Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Behrouz Kamalvandi, said, “In the inked roadmap, no permission has been issued for the IAEA’s access to any military centers and the nuclear scientists. We have explicitly announced our positions in this regard during the [past] negotiations."
The supreme leader’s representative to the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps, Ali Saeedi, insisted publicly last month that “the enemy is not allowed to step into Iran’s strategic missile zone. The enemy is not allowed to enter our strategic depth.”
In July, after the deal was finalized, Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, assured parliamentarians that he had made access to military sites a “red line” and that all of Iran’s objectives on the matter had been “fully achieved.”
Sanctions had brought them to the table, but Obama gave them the above. Sickening leadership. On Korea, Kim was doing all his tests, all his stuff while Obama was there, Obama did nothing, that was his form of ‘cozying up to and bowing down’ while Kim was making all these advances in Nuclear weaponry and testing, and told Trump, this will be your most dangerous thing you will run into. Yea, thanks Obama. Obama did little to nothing of help in curtailing Kim so for a Democrat to criticize Trump is laughable.
Now for open borders. Many Democrat candidates want to promote the destruction of ICE. They voted against Kate’s law. They are for sanctuary cities. Are against deportation of not just illegal aliens, but criminal illegal aliens with their support of Sanctuary cities. Feinstein produced a bill that would not allow any arrests of illegals within 100 miles of the border, ie. open borders, even Susan Collins and Lisa Murch(k)?owski, Democrats in Republican clothing couldn’t go with:
More details here:
So they encourage families to come, even fake families come with Democrat support, because they don’t want us to test if they are really blood related. They are for catch and release, thousand come right now, that they can’t deport. They are for catch and release, they are against expanding the number of beds. It should be catch and deport them out of the country, into Mexico, and they are allowed back when the case is heard, if they win the asylum case, then release them. But not the Democrats. Now they are released into the interior of the US and most don’t show up for the hearing. Of course it is fraudulent as it is, because if it was real dangerous, they can get asylum in Mexico to stay. There is no need.
Democrats are against including a wall, (no one says only the wall is what we need, as there are some places it is not necessary, and there are other things necessary to do, but they are fighting against it, which means that people can cross at many points in a border. A wall would make it more difficult. They want us to be the welfare, Oh look at those poor children, (the means of letting parents sometimes non-parents getting in), let us take care of them, while ignoring that these policies include the encouragement of drug trafficking which leads to the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans every year. It leads to sex trafficking and rape of a huge amount of girls/women trying to get here, so what, according to Democrats.
The Green new deal is crazy. If the alternative energies are feasible it should be able to do it without massive government spending.
I don’t deny that Trump is not a model in the way he talks, is not the best person. However, his policies are better than the above. I’d love for a Democrat to offer sensible alternatives to the above.
Actually they can one of the major powers a president does have that they abuse often is starting new wars and as annoying as Trump can be at this point at least he’s not put us in a new conflict. Look at Iraq and Libya both a mess.
Most other issues can be voted on and struck down in Congress.
Well that aged well.
1 Like
