It obviously is not.
A judge ordered that guy not to be deported to ES. And yet…
So, no, it’s not.
The same “doo doo process” that allowed them to illegally invade America?
An admitted mistake. This has already been beat to death.
Nowhere in the constitution does it say someone in this country illegally is entitled to have a trial in order to determine whether or not they are to be deported.
1 Like
And yet here you are claiming that he was an MS13 leader
He was and still is.
I’m confused. This has already been discussed multiple times. Have you even bothered to read the thread?
I have.
It’s a weird. A guy with no criminal convictions is accused to have been a convicted ms 13 memember Funny how that works
You will believe anything a government official tells you. Even if it doesn’t make any sense
1 Like
clearly stated in the 5th
Allan
He is a known prominent member of MS 13 who entered this country illegally in 2011. He was set for deportation back to his home country of El Salvador in 2019. The courts prevented that deportation because he feared for his life if returned.
Since he couldn’t be deported, the administration had no choice but to release him. Nothing has really changed since 2019. He is still a prominent member of MS 13. In 2025, he was mistakenly deported to El Salvador against the courts order not to deport him. That was the mistake. It doesn’t mean he isn’t exactly who the government said he was.
By all means show me the exact language that says an illegal alien can’t be deported with a trial.
“Known and prominent” was said by a government official after they made the mistake. The same official said he was a convicted ms13 member even though he didn’t have criminal convictions
You are repeating something said to you by a government official who screwed up and some of i what they are saying doesn’t actually make sense.
Yet here you are repeating it as if it is all true
I especially love your use of the word prominent. As if it’s that’s something you knew because you researched it 
1 Like
Well, once again you deflect from the fact that a subversive judge has used their office of public trust to issue a TRO, based on a written opinion which misrepresents legislative intent to arrive at the erroneous conclusion justifying the TRO.
As I previous pointed out to you, adhering to legislative intent certainly does matter.
in Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U.S. 197 (1903) our Supreme Court indicated:
“A thing may be within the letter of a statute and not within its meaning, and within its meaning, though not within its letter. The intention of the lawmaker is the law.”
Our Supreme Court has also instructed that:
The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it._____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)
So, again I ask you, why are you ok with Judge Henderson ignoring the legislative intent of the Alien Enemies Act and obstructing the President’s authority under the Act?
Why are you ok with Judge Henderson nullifying our last federal election and the people’s guaranteed right to vote for change of existing public policy, and judge Henderson nullifying the will of the people by subverting our system‘s rule of law requiring legislative intent to be adhered to?
the trump admin says mistake cannot be rectified as he is in foreign hands.
Allan
Is there a point in there?
Here is another perspective.
2 Likes
That’s behind a paywall unfortunately. Where does it show him being a prominent and known leader of ms13 other than on the say so of a government official who alresdybscreeed up once.
I thought you were using those terms because you knew. Weird
I don’t subscribe but can get to the article.
Google searches result in about 99% links to LIB dominated medias sites, all regurgitating the same LW talking points. You are dutifully doing the same.
The Washington Examiner article was like a breath of fresh air. It provides a very different look at the issue.
1 Like
Would y’all quit using that damned excuse for not having to read an article you have no interest in reading because it’s not your narrative?
archive.ph people. Learn it, know it, use it.
Yall would.be flunking my classes at this point.
2 Likes
Ok teach. Thanks for them heads up. Knowledge is power
ETA: That is pretty cool. Thanks again
1 Like
I am sure it fed your biases quite nicely. Did it actually state what you called him or did you realize that known and prominent and convicted was completely made up by the same people who screwed up.
