Maybe. But Cybersecurity is still a very new concept to the US government. Especially Detection and Response.
However we are now 4 years later… with several thorough investigations that point to Russia. The fact that we still have denial of those actions is ridiculous. We are much smarter today than in 2015.
Under DOJ policy the only tangible result of an investigation of the President is exoneration…
It’s either exoneration or … nothing… just a report.
I think you’re probably right about this…unless something significant is revealed in Trump’s financials or other testimony that breaks the proverbial camel’s back.
“Due to DOJ guidlines we were unable to bring charges against the sitting president”.
Could have included that one simple little line to tell people he was guilty.
But instead Mueller said it different.
“[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,”
He could have just as easily put, this report concludes the president committed a crime, but we are unable to issue an indictment.
He could have done that real simple.
Instead, it’s we do no conclude the president committed a crime. Nor do we clear him of one.
“If we had confidence the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”
It’s this simple.
Who else committed obstruction?
Again, Muller in his report could have said there was clear evidence but we can’t do anything about it.
I don’t think that they will find anything crazy in the financials that Mueller or the IRS doesn’t already have.
He did. 10 of them.
The whole point of the policy is to avoid having a sitting President who is considered to be a criminal… your example violates that…
Calling him a criminal but not indicting is nonsensical in regard to that policy.
“We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime.”
“We determined that we would not reach a determination one way or the other”
Mueller was not vague or giving some sort of cryptic signal as to guilt.
He made it very clear they were never going to accuse him directly of committing a crime because, as there would never be an indictment or a trial, there would be no means for the President to defend himself against the charges.
They also made it clear that if they thought he had done nothing worthy of being charged for they would have said so.
Mueller is a total joke. He said nothing new from what we know already fom the report, but just inciting and playing now with the media, unveiling his partisanship.
“ummm…we cant take any conclusion, lets the Congress and the liberal media continue that scam”
That wasnt his job and the excuses “we cant do it because, muh the rule of DOJ” are pathetic! Does he want different rulles, or even no rules,above the law and the system??? His job was to investigate and come to a conclusion. By claiming now he couldnt, but at the same time claiming Trump wouldnt be exhonerated, he actually says “we wanted Trump removed from office, no matter if there is a reason, couldnt fabricate anything, so let the Congress do it nevertheless”
Thats a distraction attempt from the investigation of the investigators, the deep state is panicking and sent Mueller to incite again
Nobody puts Bobby in a corner.
Why do you suppose that the dems have not impeached yet? Does that frustrate you?
Yet they didn’t.
So if they had confidence the president clearly DID commit a crime we he have said so then? Make it sound like he would have. Sounds like Mueller wasn’t convinced he did or didn’t.
No, they didn’t.
The phone call that has been talked about. That wasn’t the president.
Mueller explained in the report that he would not accuse or charge Trump of a crime because, since DOJ guidelines say you cannot charge a sitting president, there would have been no trial in which Trump could have defended himself.
