Black actor beaten and almost lynched by mask wearing thugs

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

Perhaps. Perhaps you are making judgments and perhaps you too don’t understand the point i am trying to make .

You are right.

[FreeAndClear]

I did indeed and my point stands - you don’t get to pick and choose hate crime based on the egregiousness of the act. It is either a thought crime or is not.

[FreeAndClear]

@DougBH understood exactly what i was trying to say. Sorry if it got confusing.

[Munimula1]

@Samm

@Munimula1

Righties, you should be more bothered by these hoaxes:
-DT birther hoax
-Death panel hoax
-The Trump University hoax
-Nat’l emergency hoax
-Mexico will pay for wall hoax a WMD hoax that killed 1million Iraqis & 5k+ US troops

Sorry. I’m not seeing any crimes there.

LOL 10char

[dantes]

And now we’ve hit on the second longest myth.

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

I did indeed and my point stands - you don’t get to pick and choose hate crime based on the egregiousness of the act. It is either a thought crime or is not.

The label “hate crime” came out of the “Jussie” camp. Yet you accused WR of endorsing “thought crime” because he suggested that the penalty for filing a false claim of being a victim of a “hate crime,” should be the same as having committed that crime. Nothing he posted even remotely suggested that he believes in criminalizing thought.

[Samm]

@dantes

And now we’ve hit on the second longest myth.

Not a myth. Do your homework.

[dantes]

I have. That’s why I know it’s a myth.

You aren’t one of those guys that believes every random thing that you read on the internet?

[FreeAndClear]

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

I did indeed and my point stands - you don’t get to pick and choose hate crime based on the egregiousness of the act. It is either a thought crime or is not.

The label “hate crime” came out of the “Jussie” camp. Yet you accused WR of endorsing “thought crime” because he suggested that the penalty for filing a false claim of being a victim of a “hate crime,” should be the same as having committed that crime. Nothing he posted even remotely suggested that he believes in criminalizing thought.

@WildRose

I’d be perfectly fine with that but then I don’t think such an offense should be a hate crime to start with.

"Hate Crimes" charges should be reserved for the most egregious acts of hate, not vandalism.

How about this? Faking a hate crime should bring at least a minimum sentence equal to the sentence given for the offender in an actual hate crime?

Are you sure you followed the thread correctly?

[Samm]

@dantes

I have. That’s why I know it’s a myth.

You aren’t one of those guys that believes every random thing that you read on the internet?

Why do you think everything someone posts that you disagree with came via the Internet ( or FOX News)? Did you hear that on NSNBC or CNN?

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

I did indeed and my point stands - you don’t get to pick and choose hate crime based on the egregiousness of the act. It is either a thought crime or is not.

The label “hate crime” came out of the “Jussie” camp. Yet you accused WR of endorsing “thought crime” because he suggested that the penalty for filing a false claim of being a victim of a “hate crime,” should be the same as having committed that crime. Nothing he posted even remotely suggested that he believes in criminalizing thought.

@WildRose

I’d be perfectly fine with that but then I don’t think such an offense should be a hate crime to start with.

"Hate Crimes" charges should be reserved for the most egregious acts of hate, not vandalism.

How about this? Faking a hate crime should bring at least a minimum sentence equal to the sentence given for the offender in an actual hate crime?

Are you sure you followed the thread correctly?

Yes, absolutely.

[thinkingman]

this is a good article showing what a disgrace ABC “news” is. note especially how she (Roberts) asked questions to build the lefty narrative instead of being a journslist, which she is absolutely nothing even close

Montage: ABC’s Roberts Uses Interview to Try Salvaging Smollett’s Sensational...

[FreeAndClear]

So do you believe that the bolded part was dealing with false report or hate crime in general. I am just trying to the the bottom of the disconnect here

[dantes]

I can tell the difference between reality and internet conspiracies. It’s garnered from many years of experience.

[coolidge]

Nah i am more concerned on liberals making stuff up about people wearing MAGA hats. This thread is prime example on how far many will go to paint an image of trump supporters

[Cratic3947]

I hope he gets at least a few months… He’s so mindlessly selfish he tried to divide the nation even more for his career… Also, you’ll need a lot of proof in the future when a liberal cries attack by a person in a MAGA hat.

A lot like the MAGA kids story…

[Cratic3947]

and notice the right knew it was fake news from the beginning and the media and most leftist accepted it immediately. Just like Russian collusion…

[Nemesis]

@Cratic3947

and notice the right knew it was fake news from the beginning and the media and most leftist accepted it immediately. Just like Russian collusion…

It was not fake news. The media was reporting the story in the way that Smollett reported it to the police. Now if the media ignored these new developments and continued just reporting on what they knew originally I would agree it was fake news.

The right is really no better with stories, just take a look at the crap Briebart peddles.

People seem to think there was some golden age when newspapers and by extension the rest of the news media had no political leanings.

[zonulet]

@coolidge

Nah i am more concerned on liberals making stuff up about people wearing MAGA hats. This thread is prime example on how far many will go to paint an image of trump supporters

This alt left guy Jussie is so privileged, he had to hire someone to oppress him.

[conan]

Libs Samm…Libs.