Not sure you want to open that can of worms.
1 Like
Subject Matter Expert
You should. Not your place. 
I hope it stops posters getting blamed for someone altering their post.
1 Like
Me too.
Did it change the meaning of what was said? No.
I suspect the poster didnāt want to repeat the fat Donald part of the post, which has gotten old, and I canāt blame him, but wanted to respond to the poster with a quote of his post.
You guys insisting on getting him in trouble for something so trivial is more of a concern on my Mod-o-meter.
4 Likes
I think they are just trying to understand the rules around editing another post, that isnāt your own.
I am curious as well. What is the threshold? Can I edit your post and remove āmod o meterā?
It was. Thatās where I heard it.
fat shaming or hat shaming?
Changes the context. Slippery slope but if these are the guidelines you want, itās up to you.
I specifically suggested a simple answer that did not involve āgetting anyone in troubleā
Hat no doubtā¦but in the spirit of that thread, authoritarians too.
The subject of the venerable western chapeau.
Sort of. But will this be an investigation or a prosecution? Do you think they will be looking for the truth? Or looking for a way to condemn the border patrol? I donāt think that they will be investigation anything. But we wonāt have long to wait to find out.
I didnāt realize there was such a thing as a hat elitist?
The only branch that can prosecute is the executive branchā¦ Not sure why you keep deflecting to the legislative branchā¦ Itās either willful ignorance or a deliberate attempt to deflectā¦
Sort of?
You want an investigation, correct? So does AOC.
I bet sheās got some pics and video to present at the Congressional investigation hearings.
Itās because of this man. He gets them all in a bat ā ā ā ā crazy mode.
1 Like
I disagreeā¦I should because then it helps me avoid those mistakesā¦
You mean how the media and the justice system has two sets of rules for democrats and republicans, lib?
1 Like
