Big trouble for AOC?

[lessright]

Nice off topic segue. But to answer your question I think it’s like how Trump supporters have two sets of rules for lies. One for Trump lies and a higher standard for a five-year-old’s lies.

[Vigilante]

@FlameHeart

You mean how the media and the justice system has two sets of rules for democrats and republicans?

I think thats a silly and pitiful remark. Oh poor me!

Because they dont. Its your imagination

[Samm]

@madasheck

@Samm

@Apocalypto

@Samm

Highlighting and quoting a portion of someone’s post is a function of the Forum software. It is not considered editing under the rules.

He removed a word from the middle of my quote he was responding to. Nothing to do with the forum software.

Sorry, I missed that, however, removing a derogatory adjective from the quote did not change the meaning of the statement. Perhaps you are being a bit too sensitive.

He’s not. You can edit quotes but you must indicate you’ve done so. Using (snip) has always been an indication. But there are specific limits to editing quotes. Maybe a mod will pop in here and say what they are.

Yeah, heaven forbid that someone snip a derogatory word from anyone’s quote without noting it.

[reflechissez]

@Samm

@madasheck

@Samm

@Apocalypto

@Samm

Highlighting and quoting a portion of someone’s post is a function of the Forum software. It is not considered editing under the rules.

He removed a word from the middle of my quote he was responding to. Nothing to do with the forum software.

Sorry, I missed that, however, removing a derogatory adjective from the quote did not change the meaning of the statement. Perhaps you are being a bit too sensitive.

He’s not. You can edit quotes but you must indicate you’ve done so. Using (snip) has always been an indication. But there are specific limits to editing quotes. Maybe a mod will pop in here and say what they are.

Yeah, heaven forbid that someone snip a derogatory word from anyone’s quote without noting it.

It’s what trump would do.

[Oldandtired]

Can you tell me why California is forcing people to sleep and crap on the streets without showers or basic medical for weeks on end. I am willing to bet that these people who are sleeping on the streets in California don’t have soap or tooth paste.
Do you think that treating the poor people of California like this is honorable?
Don’t you think that California should build facilities for all these people to sleep in and bathrooms with soap and toothpaste so these poor people can shower and have a safe place to sleep?

[Samm]

@moonshine

https://thehill.com/latino/451414-dhs-watchdog-finds-dangerous-overcrowding-prolonged-detention-at-rio-grande-border

You know what would solve this problem? For people to stop pouring across the border illegally. Maybe we should put up a wall …

[madasheck]

@Samm

@madasheck

@Samm

@Apocalypto

@Samm

Highlighting and quoting a portion of someone’s post is a function of the Forum software. It is not considered editing under the rules.

He removed a word from the middle of my quote he was responding to. Nothing to do with the forum software.

Sorry, I missed that, however, removing a derogatory adjective from the quote did not change the meaning of the statement. Perhaps you are being a bit too sensitive.

He’s not. You can edit quotes but you must indicate you’ve done so. Using (snip) has always been an indication. But there are specific limits to editing quotes. Maybe a mod will pop in here and say what they are.

Yeah, heaven forbid that someone snip a derogatory word from anyone’s quote without noting it.

Nothing derogatory about the truth.

[Vigilante]

The Irish were processed 5K-10K a day

[Samm]

@madasheck

@Samm

@madasheck

@Samm

@Apocalypto

@Samm

Highlighting and quoting a portion of someone’s post is a function of the Forum software. It is not considered editing under the rules.

He removed a word from the middle of my quote he was responding to. Nothing to do with the forum software.

Sorry, I missed that, however, removing a derogatory adjective from the quote did not change the meaning of the statement. Perhaps you are being a bit too sensitive.

He’s not. You can edit quotes but you must indicate you’ve done so. Using (snip) has always been an indication. But there are specific limits to editing quotes. Maybe a mod will pop in here and say what they are.

Yeah, heaven forbid that someone snip a derogatory word from anyone’s quote without noting it.

Nothing derogatory about the truth.

Of course there is. Try calling your overweight wife fat.

[Samm]

@Vigilante

The Irish were processed 5K-10K a day

That’s because they came legally by the boat load. Between boats, none were processed.

[Vigilante]

Prove his negative. I dint think so. Prove illegals do vote

[Oldandtired]

I asked first.

[madasheck]

@Samm

@madasheck

@Samm

@madasheck

@Samm

@Apocalypto

@Samm

Highlighting and quoting a portion of someone’s post is a function of the Forum software. It is not considered editing under the rules.

He removed a word from the middle of my quote he was responding to. Nothing to do with the forum software.

Sorry, I missed that, however, removing a derogatory adjective from the quote did not change the meaning of the statement. Perhaps you are being a bit too sensitive.

He’s not. You can edit quotes but you must indicate you’ve done so. Using (snip) has always been an indication. But there are specific limits to editing quotes. Maybe a mod will pop in here and say what they are.

Yeah, heaven forbid that someone snip a derogatory word from anyone’s quote without noting it.

Nothing derogatory about the truth.

Of course there is. Try calling your overweight wife fat.

Or hearing your wife telling you you’re lousy in bed.

[Samm]

@madasheck

@Samm

@madasheck

@Samm

@madasheck

@Samm

@Apocalypto

@Samm

Highlighting and quoting a portion of someone’s post is a function of the Forum software. It is not considered editing under the rules.

He removed a word from the middle of my quote he was responding to. Nothing to do with the forum software.

Sorry, I missed that, however, removing a derogatory adjective from the quote did not change the meaning of the statement. Perhaps you are being a bit too sensitive.

He’s not. You can edit quotes but you must indicate you’ve done so. Using (snip) has always been an indication. But there are specific limits to editing quotes. Maybe a mod will pop in here and say what they are.

Yeah, heaven forbid that someone snip a derogatory word from anyone’s quote without noting it.

Nothing derogatory about the truth.

Of course there is. Try calling your overweight wife fat.

Or hearing your wife telling you you’re lousy in bed.

Which snipped out word from the pertinent statement inspired that left-field response?

[Plasmaball]

It’s like he used the word cankles…somehow I doubt samm would be arguing over it if this was rush

[Plasmaball]

The right has called Hillary fat for years. Not a peep. From you folks…

That is what makes your argument hilarious

[Plasmaball]

Aoc in trouble yet?
Another con by the gullible

[Blackwolf]

Fat shaming is trolling.

Now, cankle shaming? That ■■■■ never stops being hilarious.

[MidwestIndy]

@Oldandtired

Show your proof that no illegals vote?

No sir, you dont get to do that lazy ■■■■■ You seem to think illegals vote you prove that. I’m under no obligation to prove a negative.

A whole comission was formed by a person from my own ■■■■■■■ state of Kansas in Kris Kobach on this very issue and guess what the ■■■■ he found? Suffice to say it was so devoid of anything even resembling his assertions before it began it was swept under the rug, and died in a flame of well… nothing.

This isnt a game you want to play with me, trust that.

Not even a sentence into that retort and I can see it isnt up to the challenge. Your second sentence shows unequivocally that you absolutely did not read the post you responded to or have any understanding of the issue in any way whatsoever. Giving out smokes to Native Americans for votes in the 3rd sentence? ■■■? There cant possibly be anyone else reading this that that is reading this that is taking this serious at this point.

Please don’t waste my time.

[Samm]

@Plasmaball

The right has called Hillary fat for years. Not a peep. From you folks…

That is what makes your argument hilarious

No, the right called her “lyin’ Hillary” which she was.