I don’t know if they did our not…but again I really don’t care either.
But again that’s just me.
I don’t know if they did our not…but again I really don’t care either.
But again that’s just me.
Of a quote. The original post is intact.
Maybe I can help:
HEY! Y’ALL STOP THAT PLEASE!
Let’s see what that does.
Ummm. I’m not sure you’re grasping how this all works.
AOC is a member of the Oversight Committee. She’ll be there - but not as a witness.
lol good to hear
maybe theres hope for you yet!
altair1013:Thank you for this! I am shocked and I am surprised. I also can’t wait to see it! Do you think it will simply be a big show? Do you think this might be the next impeachment attempt since Russia flopped? Maybe Cummings will have some answers on what to do with the overflow of invaders. And I hope AOC shows up to provide her testimony. Don’t you?
It’s your turn. Where is fat donald and the Republicans on this?
Yes just where is Fat Donald and his Tub of Lardness on this issue?
I agree. Fat shaming is trolling.
How about Hat shaming?
I agree. She should resent the hell out of her hatter.
WuWei:I agree. Fat shaming is trolling.
How about Hat shaming?
I agree. She should resent the hell out of her hatter.
No. And I happen to be an SME on the subject.
I don’t recognize your acronym
I don’t recognize your acronym
Subject matter expert.
Not sure you want to open that can of worms.
I don’t recognize your acronym
Subject Matter Expert
You should. Not your place.
I hope it stops posters getting blamed for someone altering their post.
I hope it stops posters getting blamed for someone altering their post.
Me too.
Did it change the meaning of what was said? No.
I suspect the poster didn’t want to repeat the fat Donald part of the post, which has gotten old, and I can’t blame him, but wanted to respond to the poster with a quote of his post.
You guys insisting on getting him in trouble for something so trivial is more of a concern on my Mod-o-meter.
Did it change the meaning of what was said? No.
I suspect the poster didn’t want to repeat the fat Donald part of the post, which has gotten old, and I can’t blame him, but wanted to respond to the poster with a quote of his post.
You guys insisting on getting him in trouble for something so trivial is more of a concern on my Mod-o-meter.
I think they are just trying to understand the rules around editing another post, that isn’t your own.
I am curious as well. What is the threshold? Can I edit your post and remove “mod o meter”?
They just passed a bill last week… Was this not covered on Fox News?
It was. That’s where I heard it.
Subject Matter Expert
fat shaming or hat shaming?
Did it change the meaning of what was said? No.
I suspect the poster didn’t want to repeat the fat Donald part of the post, which has gotten old, and I can’t blame him, but wanted to respond to the poster with a quote of his post.
You guys insisting on getting him in trouble for something so trivial is more of a concern on my Mod-o-meter.
Changes the context. Slippery slope but if these are the guidelines you want, it’s up to you.
I specifically suggested a simple answer that did not involve “getting anyone in trouble”
Hat no doubt…but in the spirit of that thread, authoritarians too.