Biden Investigated for Classified Documents!

[FreeAndClear]

You guys keep using tape…. As if you know what’s on it. Or as if it’s not just like the pee pee tape.

Doesn’t even register. It’s amazing.

[DMK]

@FreeAndClear

Of course not. Stating that you have enough common sense to reach a conclusion is though. Because it’s in comparison to those who can’t.

Where there is smoke, there is fire. Or, in lib land, where there is smoke there must be dry ice around somewhere.

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

@FreeAndClear

Because you were told it has all the earmarks of money laundering.

Remember it’s only the beginning of the investigation

And some of you already reached conclusions while simultaneously arguing that it is only the beginning of the investigation and that presumption of innocence is important. Apparently only for people you support.

You have no idea what I think or how I reach my conclusions. Knock of with the condescending attitude.

How you think or how you reach your conclusions has nothing to do with your claim that you know what the earmarks of money laundering are.

By the way i have no idea what the earmarks of money laundering are.

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

@FreeAndClear

Of course not. Stating that you have enough common sense to reach a conclusion is though. Because it’s in comparison to those who can’t.

Where there is smoke, there is fire. Or, in lib land, where there is smoke there must be dry ice around somewhere.

Right. Unless it’s a Republican. Then discernment seems to give way to excuses

The difference being i haven’t actually defended Biden once in this exchange

Because for all i know the evidence that so far exists is just the tip of an iceberg. But convicting people even in opinion based forum based on partisanship and punditry is silly.

[DMK]

@FreeAndClear

By the way i have no idea what the earmarks of money laundering are.

I guess that explains your stance and your stance against mine.

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

@FreeAndClear

By the way i have no idea what the earmarks of money laundering are.

I guess that explains your stance and your stance against mine.

Where did you learn them?

[DMK]

Throughout over 30 years in business. You learn to pick up a thing or two

Edit to add: Or you could just google it to learn about it.

[FreeAndClear]

@DMK

Throughout over 30 years in business. You learn to pick up a thing or two

Edit to add: Or you could just google it to learn about it.

That’s the problem with googling and experience.

In order to actually learn about it you have to actually research it or engage in it or prosecute it or be an investigator of it.

Money laundering is a specific criminal act.

There is a myriad of ways that it can be executed.

Being 30 years in business gives you a lot of common sense about a lot of things but it doesn’t give you experience with money laundering. Though i am sure that somewhere along the line there were warnings what not to do with operating accounts so as not to make it seem like money laundering. That’s a plausible basis though still not enough to reach over arching conclusions imo.

Unless i don’t know something. I am so kidding about that last part

[DMK]

@FreeAndClear

There is a myriad of ways that it can be executed.

Yes, taking money illegally obtained and transferring it to a legitimate purchase. I’m sure there are countless clever ways to do it. But, that is the bare-bones bottom line.

[margaretms2]

When do we get to HEAR THE TAPES?

[mobiusptc]

I’m still waiting on Michelle’s whitey tapes

[conan]

@FreeAndClear

And some of you already reached conclusions while simultaneously arguing that it is only the beginning of the investigation and that presumption of innocence is important. Apparently only for people you support.

Have to rename you…Speakwithforktongue.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

Let’s not forget the pee tape!

[FreeAndClear]

@conan

@FreeAndClear

And some of you already reached conclusions while simultaneously arguing that it is only the beginning of the investigation and that presumption of innocence is important. Apparently only for people you support.

Have to rename you…Speakwithforktongue.

Who told you?!?!

[gooddad409]

@Rodeo

@Safiel

The difference between Biden/Pence and Trump is ultimately intent. Trump has damned himself by his own very words.

Biden/Pence’s wrongdoing, if any, may likely be determined to be inadvertent and if they are criminally sanctioned, it is likely to reflect that.

Is that why Biden had classified documents from his time as VP and when he was a senator that he had no right to have…because it was “inadvertent “?

“ Washington — GOP Rep. Mike Turner, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that he cannot think of a reason for President Biden to have documents bearing classification markings from his time as vice president and senator at his Delaware home.

“This is a real critical question to all this — why did he have these documents to begin with?” Turner said in an interview with “Face the Nation.” "And that is why the special counsel’s work is going to be really important, because I can think of no reason why the president should have taken home, as a senator or as vice president, any classified documents”. GOP Rep. Mike Turner "can think of no reason" for Biden to have documents marked classified at home - CBS News

I suppose the bribes from foreign countries were inadvertent as well???

The libs and rino’s strain at a gnat when it comes to Trump and happily swallow a camel when it comes to Brandon.

[gooddad409]

@conan

@FreeAndClear

And some of you already reached conclusions while simultaneously arguing that it is only the beginning of the investigation and that presumption of innocence is important. Apparently only for people you support.

Have to rename you….Speakwithforktongue.

Any relation to Pocahontas Warren?

[Rodeo]

@gooddad409

I suppose the bribes from foreign countries were inadvertent as well???

The libs and rino’s strain at a gnat when it comes to Trump and happily swallow a camel when it comes to Brandon.

They impeached Trump over a phone call…asking about the possibility of Ukraine digging into potential bribes being given to the Biden’s. “President Donald Trump asked Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, according to a White House memorandum of a July phone call released Wednesday.

“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great,” Trump said in the July 25 call, according to the memo. “Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it, It sounds horrible to me.”. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/trump-asked-ukraine-president-if-you-can-look-into-biden-and-his-son-in-phone-call.html

Apparently Trump was right.

[Camp]

Mark these…CLASSIFIED!!

[FreeAndClear]

We just know it to be true now