Biden and Dems are still Hiding their Supreme Court Picks Why?

[Scratch]

@PhilipNolan

As far as I am aware, there are no laws requiring the dissemination of individual tax returns to the general public.

Nor supreme court picks.

[DougBH]

@Safiel

@Munimula1

You can be sure Trump has no clue about the people on his list.

You would have to refer those inquiries to the Federalist Society.

The only reason that the Trump administration has been competent and successful with judicial nominations is because he delegated that function to the Federalist Society from the start.

Hmmm…so the administration reached a successful conclusion by properly delegating a job. Isn’t that a good thing?

[Scratch]

Makes one think…Whos running the White House, the POTUS or the Federalist Society? What else are they in control of?

[FloridaYankee]

@Hawk92

Whatever happened to fairness and transparency on the democratic party side lately? its almost election and they are still hiding and wont reveal their choices for the Supreme Court until the democrats get what they wanted and that’s a majority controlled senate ? that seems a bit unfair and not transparent.

For the same liberals who are claiming that they love the constitution they dont seem to be acting upon it. By trying to hide their choices for the Courts. Is it problary they know because their choices would be problary to socialist on the issues?

Schumer on the interviews this past weeks has claimed that he and dems would throw everything to make “god willing” to make sure to pack the courts. Even stating he would make it so if Puerto Rico becomes a state.

Merrick Garland

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

I know that they won’t be someone from the Federalist society pipeline and that is good enough for me

What pipeline do the dems use?

[DougBH]

@Scratch

Makes one think…Whos running the White House, the POTUS or the Federalist Society? What else are they in control of?

They are in control of nothing. Every President has to rely on experts. Do you think Obama was familiar with everyone he nominated to a judicial position?

[Scratch]

I would say much more so than Trump, seeing how Obama was a lawyer and in that loop…I’d be willing to wager that before he ran for POTUS, Trump wouldn’t have been able to name all 9 justices. And it wouldn’t be a long shot to say, that he didn’t even know how many justices were on the bench.

[Hawk92]

Schumer said, God Willing if We Win everything is on the Table. We will have The Court Packing. The dems have a plan to end Filibuster among court packing with problary leftist judges.

This would only happen if Blue wins House/Senate/WH they will have everything on the table this is coming Schumer and among other dems who said something similar the past few weeks.

But according to some here nah everything will be fine and back to normal right? what normacly? the one where dems are packing their leftist judges packing the courts over moderate judges?
Schumer: If Dems Win, Abolishing Filibuster & Court Packing, “Everything Is On The Table”

[Hawk92]

And Harris is a supposed former cop that somehow defends Jacob Blake as a hero i supposed i am sure she has become qutie a good pick for Biden and the democrats right? for someone like Harris who encouraged people to support a bail out fund site that bailed out rioters. “Peaceful protsoters who arent able to bail out themselves once arrested”

I would consider Harris as similar as how McCain had chosen Sarah Palin.

[MEJones]

Obama is on the list, that’s why !

[Sknyluv]

Republicans, just ask yourself … would McConnell do the same thing?

[DougBH]

@Sknyluv

Republicans, just ask yourself … would McConnell do the same thing?

Well, no, Republicans didn’t do the same thing. There was a point when they had the House, Senate and Presidency all at the same time. Did they pack the court?

[SottoVoce]

@DougBH

@Sknyluv

Republicans, just ask yourself … would McConnell do the same thing?

Well, no, Republicans didn’t do the same thing. There was a point when they had the House, Senate and Presidency all at the same time. Did they pack the court?

Who cares? Republicans used their power to do what they wanted. Democrats can do the same. The attempt at tu quoque is laughable.

[Ben_Natuf]

what you fantasize about is irrelevant. there is no requirement to do so.

[hwyflier]

merrick garland

[Ben_Natuf]

silly equation. one effects the nation for generations, the other is none of anyone’s business

[PhilipNolan]

@BlueHeron

And there is also no law concerning a candidates SCOTUS list, which is the topic of this discussion.

Well, ok then, back on topic. The reason the Dems & Biden haven’t released a list is because they don’t have one.

[gooddad409]

@PhilipNolan

@BlueHeron

And there is also no law concerning a candidates SCOTUS list, which is the topic of this discussion.

Well, ok then, back on topic. The reason the Dems & Biden haven’t released a list is because they don’t have one.

They don’t want independents to know who they have in mind.

[DougBH]

That’s it. If they give their list they either alienate the far leftists who’s vote they want or give up any pretense at being middle of the road and alienating the independents.

[Scratch]

Really? You dont think that who he is indebted to could effect his policy decisions?