Maybe we could have 4 members of the house who are democrats and four members of the house who are republicans appoint someone at the beginning of each election.
And that person would serve for 4 years and they could investigate every aspect of the presidential candidates lives and after the election they could investigate the Presidents campaign and life.
Works for me.
You know that we can’t depend on the people we send to DC to actually do their jobs according to the left. Or maybe it’s just the right side of the aisle that they believe can’t do their jobs? Their side are so honest and such saints.
Who cares? If Rosenstein recommended firing Comey for X and Trump says but I’m firing him for Y, who cares what X was? Not to mention it’s laughable on its face that trump would fire Comey for being too mean to Hillary. He wanted Comey to drop the Flynn thing, he said he fired him because of Russia, but no he really fired him because a guy he hates says Comey acted improperly by being mean to Hillary.
The bar for what is acceptable has been set so low that when a Special Council finds that the President is surrounded by criminals, the repose isn’t “Holy ■■■■ the President is surrounded by criminals” but that they shouldn’t have been investigated in the first place.
Well then they would have to actually talk about policy positions, the last democratic who did that was AOC who since has been silenced after calling for the genocide of cows, ending air travel, and driving away Amazon and 50,000 jobs to NY.
You’re confusing the onus of the state to prosecute vs. whether or not someone actually did commit a crime. If I rape someone, the state not being able to prove it doesnt male me a non criminal
I thought Rosenstein commented on his letter. As I recall (no I won’t go find it for you) he said Trump asked him to put something in the letter about the Rusher investigation. Rosenstein didn’t.