What is more powerfulâŚthe grace of God or Original Sin?
An interesting fact is that Original Sin did not become dogma until about the third or fourth century. It does not have its roots in Judaism, or Islam for that matter. Perhaps more surprising, Orthodox Catholics hold no belief in Original Sin either.
I think Original Sin is best described as human propensity towards sin. This can be overcome.
Would âfully Divine-of-heavenâ include being omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent? Because the Son emptied himself of these when He became human and received them back when he was resurrected and glorified. He was the same Person and without beginning who participated with Father and Holy Spirit in the creation of the universe, but did not have all those same attributes that many consider necessary for Godness.
Could you cite the biblical scripture that references original sin? It seems to be a straw man.
The doctrine of original sin began to emerge in the 3rd century but only became fully formed with the writings of Augustine of Hippo (354â430), who was the first author to use the phrase âoriginal sinâ (Latin: peccatum originale ).[3][4] Augustineâs conception of original sin was based on a mistranslated passage in Paul the Apostleâs Epistle to the Romans, and scholars have debated whether the passage supports Augustineâs view.[5][6][7]
20 years ago, I too wouldâve doubled down on a different goalpost instead of simply understanding the point. Those youthful years were defensive times. lol