“illegally removed House data from the House network or from House Members’ offices, stole the House Democratic Caucus Server, stole or destroyed House information technology equipment, or improperly accessed or transferred government information, including classified or sensitive information”
he copped a plea so that the investigation stopped before they could prove this stuff
No, they literally said he didn’t did those things. If you take a plea deal to a lesser offense, they don’t come out and say you didn’t commit the prior charges, you just aren’t tried for them. That is not what happened here.
You’re right. They performed an investigation which began in September of 2016 and found no evidence. How much can you possibly read into this to twist it to your satisfaction?
Reasons for a plea deal? Avoid trial. Avoid court costs. Avoid more money and resources spent by the government. Hasten the completion of an investigation.
It’s the same as the IG report that failed to confirm their already developed conclusions. The lack of evidence is all the evidence they need to confirm their conspiracy is real.