What?
No and you know it. The dishonesty reeks.
What are the MAGA grievances against whom?
When you start with assuming the goal the conclusions are easy
The good intentions of better environmental impact hoax or not
Foreign wars is a funny one. Totally a crit prog thing unless of course they are necessary because hindsight told us it was.
TheDoctorIsIn:Grievance politics
What are the MAGA grievances against whom?
Critprogs. They are the ones making your lives miserable. Elect us and we will make it leas miserable by making America great again because all the critprogs want to do is make you miserable
Rinse repeat
When you start with assuming the goal the conclusions are easy
I’m not assuming, the goals are very clearly stated.
The good intentions of better environmental impact hoax or not
What are the “good intentions”?
Ukraine is not.
WuWei: TheDoctorIsIn:Grievance politics
What are the MAGA grievances against whom?
Critprogs. They are the ones making your lives miserable. Elect us and we will make it leas miserable by making America great again because all the critprogs want to do is make you miserable
Rinse repeat
You don’t get to ignore the dogma.
FreeAndClear:When you start with assuming the goal the conclusions are easy
I’m not assuming, the goals are very clearly stated.
FreeAndClear:The good intentions of better environmental impact hoax or not
What are the “good intentions”?
Ukraine is not.
They really are not. They are stated by those whom you have chosen as the founders. It pure assumption though not without merit.
Neither is Saudi Arabia alas.
FreeAndClear: WuWei: TheDoctorIsIn:Grievance politics
What are the MAGA grievances against whom?
Critprogs. They are the ones making your lives miserable. Elect us and we will make it leas miserable by making America great again because all the critprogs want to do is make you miserable
Rinse repeat
You don’t get to ignore the dogma.
And you don’t get to ignore that the entirety of maga rhetoric is based on blaming others.
WuWei: FreeAndClear:When you start with assuming the goal the conclusions are easy
I’m not assuming, the goals are very clearly stated.
FreeAndClear:The good intentions of better environmental impact hoax or not
What are the “good intentions”?
Ukraine is not.
They really are not. They are stated by those whom you have chosen as the founders. It pure assumption though not without merit.
Neither is Saudi Arabia alas.
I didn’t choose anybody. Why do you refuse to read the dogma that is so clearly being followed?
Neither is Saudi Arabia alas.
Absolutely correct. What is to be done?
And you don’t get to ignore that the entirety of maga rhetoric is based on blaming others.
You’re completely missing the point, is it intentional?
Blaming what on whom?
Capitalism creates opportunities to build a better life. Socialism does not.
Do you deny it?
Who told you that?
A very lazy way to rationalize.
No and you know it. The dishonesty reeks.
And this is your response… “Nuh uh”
The good intentions of better environmental impact hoax or not
But when you’re being prey upon to line the pockets of rich left-wing elites…how is that a good thing?
Critprogs. They are the ones making your lives miserable. Elect us and we will make it leas miserable by making America great again because all the critprogs want to do is make you miserable
How is lower fuel prices, lower food prices, housing etc and made in America a bad thing?
And you don’t get to ignore that the entirety of maga rhetoric is based on blaming others.
And when you create problems who do we blame?
Who should be blamed for sky high fuel prices, inflation and food prices?
You’re completely missing the point, is it intentional?
Damn right it’s intentional…
You’re arguing something that I am not.
and to maintain domestic tranquility the president can order the national guard around the country.
Allan