Cato? I knew you would post that.
Yes, we have more richer people than Sweden.
You seem to think those with more money are happier. You have swallowed that capitalistic pill.
Cato? I knew you would post that.
Yes, we have more richer people than Sweden.
You seem to think those with more money are happier. You have swallowed that capitalistic pill.
No, you have not.
Typical, lazy response.
Read the thread.
WuWei:Go look it up yourself.
Typical, lazy response.
Should have done those other two years.
zantax:You are welcome.
Cato? I knew you would post that.
Yes, we have more richer people than Sweden.You seem to think those with more money are happier. You have swallowed that capitalistic pill.
Money doesn’t buy happiness but oh heck never mind, yes it does. Money is the freedom to do the things you want to do. As far as CATO as a source, they cited the evidence.
Advocates for something they don’t even understand while staring its failure in the face.
There has to be a Latin term for that kind of ignorance.
Money doesn’t buy happiness but oh heck never mind, yes it does.
Then why are there so many miserable rich people?
Advocates for something they don’t even understand while staring its failure in the face.
You keep going on on how Scandinavian style of capitalism, has failed, contrary to the current evidence.
Who is the one who does not understand?
zantax:Money doesn’t buy happiness but oh heck never mind, yes it does.
Then why are there so many miserable rich people?
Because people are stupid. Hoarding money doesn’t make you happy, turning it into pleasant experiences with friends and family does.
WuWei:Advocates for something they don’t even understand while staring its failure in the face.
You keep going on on how Scandinavian style of capitalism, has failed, contrary to the current evidence.
Who is the one who does not understand?
Read the thread.
zantax:Money doesn’t buy happiness but oh heck never mind, yes it does.
Then why are there so many miserable rich people?
There aren’t.
Because people are stupid. Hoarding money doesn’t make you happy, turning it into pleasant experiences with friends and family does.
Once one’s basic needs are met, with maybe a few extras…“the happiness” factor is relatively the same for someone making $100k annually, and one making $500k annually.
There aren’t.
Whatever…statements like this is why your post are not taken seriously.
WuWei:You aren’t paying attention. Focus!
Back at you…
Are you ok with us moving to where most of Scandinavia is today regarding taxes and social safety nets? Or maybe Germany…we could embrace many of the conservative policies as well.
Not at all. I look at the Scandinavia countries as Welfare States myself.
Those who have put forth their best efforts to make something of themselves including a good education and good paying jobs get the “heck” taxed out of them in those countries and that tax money gets redistributed to those who have not put forth their best efforts or in some cases no effort at all.
It is my firm opinion that this is why so many progs love the Scandinavian systems.
Many progs have not put forth their best efforts (again IMO) but desire the increased redistribution from those who have anyway…just like the Scandinavian countries.
DougBH:Scandinavian countries were never socialist countries. They are capitalist countries with strong social welfare programs. Venezuela nationalized assets and ran off foreign investors. It is a socialist country.
Wait… What?
So we CAN have a more robust social safety net without full blown SOCIALISM?
Say it ain’t so.
Cool. Let’s do that.
zantax:Money doesn’t buy happiness but oh heck never mind, yes it does.
Then why are there so many miserable rich people?
Money buys happiness up to the point where any financial worries are minimal. After that it doesn’t do much. Around 120k a couple of years ago when the study was done.
Guilds: zantax:Money doesn’t buy happiness but oh heck never mind, yes it does.
Then why are there so many miserable rich people?
There aren’t.
Plenty of ■■■■■■ up rich people with really bad family dynamics though. I meet them regularly.
Scandinavian countries were never socialist countries. They are capitalist countries with strong social welfare programs. Venezuela nationalized assets and ran off foreign investors. It is a socialist country.
the issue with Venezuela isn’t nationalized programs, its that people at the top stole all the money.
DougBH:Scandinavian countries were never socialist countries. They are capitalist countries with strong social welfare programs. Venezuela nationalized assets and ran off foreign investors. It is a socialist country.
the issue with Venezuela isn’t nationalized programs, its that people at the top stole all the money.
And destroyed the economy. Totally.