Armed Citizen Saves Cop

[WuWei]

@SimplyTrying

@WuWei

@SimplyTrying

Tomorrow or the next day someone could post a thread with a good guy with a gun who does harm thus negating the point in th op.

Let’s see three.

Try reading the word “could” and try to comprehend what that means.

Didn’t think so. Have a nice day.

[WuWei]

@WildRose

The facts don’t change because you aren’t happy with the outcome.

Doesn’t become justice just because you do.

[SimplyTrying]

@WuWei

@SimplyTrying

@WuWei

@SimplyTrying

Tomorrow or the next day someone could post a thread with a good guy with a gun who does harm thus negating the point in th op.

Let’s see three.

Try reading the word “could” and try to comprehend what that means.

Didn’t think so. Have a nice day.

Your correct. You “didn’t think”. So?

[WuWei]

@SimplyTrying

Your correct. You “didn’t think”. So?

You’re.

Buh bye.

[SimplyTrying]

@WuWei

@SimplyTrying

Your correct. You “didn’t think”. So?

You’re.

Buh bye.

I made special time for you the other day to own you in your own thread. I have no such time for you today.

[WildRose]

@SimplyTrying

@WuWei

@SimplyTrying

Tomorrow or the next day someone could post a thread with a good guy with a gun who does harm thus negating the point in th op.

Let’s see three.

Try reading the word “could” and try to comprehend what that means.

What if and what could have happened are meaningless. We know what happened.

[WildRose]

@SimplyTrying

@WildRose

@SimplyTrying

Seems my explanation of my opinion on this was deleted. Can’t really tell. So I’ll post it again.

I say this thread is merely anecdotal because it is just an attempt to further the good guy with a gun narrative. Tomorrow or the next day someone could post a thread with a good guy with a gun who does harm thus negating the point in th op.

It a good thing that a life was saved though so don’t go missing my point like so many like to do in this forum.

What it is, is a perfect example of how the good guy with a gun scenario actually plays out.

We have 1.5-2 million DGU’s in this country every year by citizens who are lawfully armed vs a tiny fraction of incidents comparatively in which criminals do harm with firearms.

In this case the life of at least one cop was saved and everyone but the bad guy got to go home.

That’s great but it doesn’t change the fact this this is merely anecdotal.

No, it’s a data point, it is a fact this happened and a fact that it turned out well for all except for the cop killer.

It’s only "anecdotal’ when you find the facts uncomfortable. This is a documented case not an unverified report of something that may or may not have happened.

[WildRose]

@WuWei

@WildRose

The facts don’t change because you aren’t happy with the outcome.

Doesn’t become justice just because you do.

I’m not the one having a problem accepting reality here. It was a good shoot.

[WuWei]

@WildRose

I’m not the one having a problem accepting reality here. It was a good shoot.

It was a horrible shoot and the cop should be in prison.

[WildRose]

@WuWei

@WildRose

I’m not the one having a problem accepting reality here. It was a good shoot.

It was a horrible shoot and the cop should be in prison.

Thankfully the shooting team and grand jury do not share your prejudice.

By any measure of the law, the officer was justified in shooting him.

[SimplyTrying]

@WildRose

@SimplyTrying

@WildRose

@SimplyTrying

Seems my explanation of my opinion on this was deleted. Can’t really tell. So I’ll post it again.

I say this thread is merely anecdotal because it is just an attempt to further the good guy with a gun narrative. Tomorrow or the next day someone could post a thread with a good guy with a gun who does harm thus negating the point in th op.

It a good thing that a life was saved though so don’t go missing my point like so many like to do in this forum.

What it is, is a perfect example of how the good guy with a gun scenario actually plays out.

We have 1.5-2 million DGU’s in this country every year by citizens who are lawfully armed vs a tiny fraction of incidents comparatively in which criminals do harm with firearms.

In this case the life of at least one cop was saved and everyone but the bad guy got to go home.

That’s great but it doesn’t change the fact this this is merely anecdotal.

No, it’s a data point, it is a fact this happened and a fact that it turned out well for all except for the cop killer.

It’s only "anecdotal’ when you find the facts uncomfortable. This is a documented case not an unverified report of something that may or may not have happened.

The above is just silly nonsense? Anecdotal means I’m uncomfortable. Come on, you have to try at least to make a bit of sense. And everything I said was true. That’s why I reposted my deleted post. It’s not me that was uncomfortable. Lol.

[Samm]

@WildRose

@WuWei

@WildRose

I’m not the one having a problem accepting reality here. It was a good shoot.

It was a horrible shoot and the cop should be in prison.

Thankfully the shooting team and grand jury do not share your prejudice.

By any measure of the law, the officer was justified in shooting him.

I may be wrong, but I’m getting the distinct impression that you guys are talking about two entirely different shootings.

[WildRose]

No, nothing you said was true. Anecdotes are not documented cases that can be verified.

[WildRose]

We are talking about a case in Ohio from last year. He still can’t get over it.

[SimplyTrying]

@WildRose

No, nothing you said was true. Anecdotes are not documented cases that can be verified.

You really don’t get this. And you are such a smart person too. I think you need to reread the thread and take your nit pick blinders off and then maybe you will see what is actually being said.

[WildRose]

No, you simply need to quit making things up.

[SimplyTrying]

@WildRose

No, you simply need to quit making things up.

I didn’t make anything up. You say untruthful things though.

[WildRose]

You have yet to say anything accurate or based in fact.

[SimplyTrying]

@WildRose

You have yet to say anything accurate or based in fact.

I guess not much truth gets into your bubble. That’s sad for you.

[WildRose]

If you ever post anything truthful in a gun thread I will certainly notice because it will be a first.