The work product is a DIRECT RESULT of the workers involved.
Like I said, if you ran a large business, you wouldn’t hire your grandma to prepare your financial statements in prep for a huge audit just because you love your grandma and she has balanced her checkbook for 80 years, and you’ll just “wait for her finished product” before you judge whether or not she is capable of creating it for you.
*This company has never done such a forensic audit
*This company has no one who is qualified such a forensic audit
*The workers have already made numerous horrible errors that no one even remotely qualified to perform this forensic audit would make
And you’re telling me that somehow they’ll miraculously create a quality “finished product” and we need to wait until they’ve done so to make a judgement?
have you seen anywhere that i prejudged the company contracted to run the program to put illegals in hotels even though they had no experience with either hotels or illegals?
no you have not.
do i think they should have been hired? no
did it effect their work? not that i’ve seen so far
This company, the clown-named CyberNinjas, failed to mark the ballots properly, broke chain of custody, violated procedures for the handling of ballots.
Endeavors was experienced at providing housing and supportive services…they’ve been doing it for homeless people for years.
What major differences do you believe there is in securing housing for homeless people and securing housing for migrants that could have caused a fatal flaw in the “finished product”?
and i expect all of that to be apparent in the report. so whats the problem? what is it with you gus that you insist everyone must denounce a report that does not as yet exist? why is it a problem for you that i will withhold final judgement until i actually see the report? they have issues, and that will be a part of whats looked at when judging the final product,
You expect a company’s management to police itself and report its errors when it has a vested reputational and financial interesting in obfuscating its errors?
*The “audit” is partisan in nature and funded by partisans- exactly the opposite of how a forensic audit should go
*The “audit” is being performed by highly unqualified individuals who have never worked a major forensic audit before
*These unqualified individuals have broken every rule of forensic auditing, have not been transparent, and have made a series of grade school errors that has completely tainted the evidence…so much so even the Republicans who backed their hiring are now complaining
And you continue to deflect away from this by saying “Well I have to wait and see how the finished product turns out until I can judge”.
That’s how we know you aren’t being objective. You would absolutely judge a service provider if they were providing you a service this badly. You would absolutely not “wait for the finished product” before making such a judgement.
