363

It sure looks like an active and sustained effort to taint a valid, certified election result.

364

Of course it is.

365

And if they succeed, which is likely, expect it everywhere and always.

366

find anywhere that i have claimed it does or does not. i have said one simple thing, i will judge the work product when its published.

playing word games is not impressive, its desperate.

and as i have said from the beginning. i will judge their work when its published. until then, there is nothing to judge. the only thing speaking volumes here is your desperation to ensure no one actually looks at the work product to determine its veracity. why is that a problem for you?

367

You cannot judge violating law or procedure, by using black and blue ink to mark twice-counted, twice-audited ballots?

368

By saying you will wait until you see a finished product shows you are granting validity to a process that has been flawed from the start, performed by a tainted company that doesn’t have the skills to do what is required to be done.

If the process is flawed and the company performing the flawed process is unqualified, there is no way the “finished product” will have any validity.

But it can be “spun” that way and it will be.

If you were truly being objective, you would realize this,

3 Likes
369

Remember when we started letting massage therapists do dentistry, and waited for the results before judging the decision?

2 Likes
370

are the procedures adequate? how do we know if we don’t check? what is the problem with checking? how do you determine if your system is working properly if you don’t analyze the results?

371

Should a company which is handling ballots be allowed to mark those ballots with ink in the color used to vote on those ballots?

372

Here you are deflecting again which is how Ii know you’re not being objective.

There’s nothing wrong with checking.

There is EVRYTHING wrong with “checking” with an unqualified company that has never done such an audit before, is run by a man who spread the conspiracy narrative, is being funded by Trump and Trump partners like Mike Lindell, is not following proper forensic audit ground rules, is not being transparent, and has already ■■■■■■ up the evidence so badly even the Republicans who initially supported this “audit” are questioning it.

If you were being objective, you would know this,

Now…what deflection away from these facts are you going to try next?

1 Like
373

no. it says i will judge the work product when its published. rejecting out of hand the veracity of the work product before its even published only shows your own taint and bias. are these guys biased? that has been established. will the bias infect their report? that has not been established. the work will speak for itself.

and that will be obvious if its the case. whats your problem with waiting to see it?

374

Will you ‘wait to see’ if border security is subcontracted to a firm wholly owned by Cargill, ADM and Purdue?

375

No it will not be obvious because like any work it can be “spun”.

You’re already “spinning” it by claiming all the objections I listed are “smear tactics” trying to impugn the credibility of the finished work instead of accepting them for the facts they are.

376

i am deflecting nothing.

i will wait for their published report to make a judgement. I’m sorry you seem incapable of separating the work product from the worker, but i’m not. why its a problem for you that i will withhold judgement until the report is published is beyond me.

377

The published report, from a company which violated ballot integrity, ballot security and ballot chain of custody?

378

The work product is a DIRECT RESULT of the workers involved.

Like I said, if you ran a large business, you wouldn’t hire your grandma to prepare your financial statements in prep for a huge audit just because you love your grandma and she has balanced her checkbook for 80 years, and you’ll just “wait for her finished product” before you judge whether or not she is capable of creating it for you.

*This company has never done such a forensic audit
*This company has no one who is qualified such a forensic audit
*The workers have already made numerous horrible errors that no one even remotely qualified to perform this forensic audit would make

And you’re telling me that somehow they’ll miraculously create a quality “finished product” and we need to wait until they’ve done so to make a judgement?

Come on, man!

2 Likes
379

This is interesting

I wonder if you ever commented on the political makeup of the Mueller team… prior to seeing the report.

You didn’t do that, did you?

380

have you seen anywhere that i prejudged the company contracted to run the program to put illegals in hotels even though they had no experience with either hotels or illegals?

no you have not.

do i think they should have been hired? no
did it effect their work? not that i’ve seen so far

381

This company, the clown-named CyberNinjas, failed to mark the ballots properly, broke chain of custody, violated procedures for the handling of ballots.

Judge that.

1 Like
382

of course i did. now go find anything anywhere where i said their report was garbage before it was published.

i acknowledge the company has displayed bias. did you acknowledge that with mueller?

now, lets wait for the report