Applying Critical Race Theory

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

HBCU funding

Now… ever wonder why black colleges exist in the first place?

Existed? No. I know why.

Good… then why is there a problem with funding them when other universities also get government funding?

Where did I say there was a problem?

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

HBCU funding

Now… ever wonder why black colleges exist in the first place?

Existed? No. I know why.

Good… then why is there a problem with funding them when other universities also get government funding?

Where did I say there was a problem?

You singled it out as a specific benefit when it really isn’t

Other universities get government funding along with HCBU’s.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

HBCUs have been funded by government/private since the early 1900s

There you go.

Compared to white universities? Peanuts.

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Nope. Women too. White women.

Of course. And black people, based on race.

So white people still benefited off legislation specifically for black people?

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

You singled it out as a specific benefit when it really isn’t

Of course it is. Earmarked and they don’t compete.

[Jezcoe]

@PurpnGold

Compared to white universities? Peanuts.

My Alma Mater is swimming in Federal funding and the first black person admitted there was there at the same time my father was.

He couldn’t live on campus or even eat on campus. He had to live with a black family a mile away even though he was in the cadet corps.

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

You singled it out as a specific benefit when it really isn’t

Of course it is. Earmarked and they don’t compete.

Funded with Pell grants and research funding… just like all other schools.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

Compared to white universities? Peanuts.

Prove it. Should have voted for Trump if you wanted more.

@PurpnGold

So white people still benefited off legislation specifically for black people?

Minority with minority.

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

You singled it out as a specific benefit when it really isn’t

Of course it is. Earmarked and they don’t compete.

Funded with Pell grants and research funding… just like all other schools.

Might want to do a little research.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Prove it. Should have voted for Trump if you wanted more

Not talking about now… talking about historically.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

Prove it. Should have voted for Trump if you wanted more

Not talking about now… talking about historically.

Ok, why?

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Ok, why?

Why what? Please don’t tell me you are asking why black universities historically got less funding than white ones.

Say it isn’t so

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

Ok, why?

Why what? Please don’t tell me you are asking why black universities historically got less funding than white ones.

Say it isn’t so

Why are you talking about “historically”?

And while we’re on the subject of “why”, why do you keep trying to compare 10% of the population to 75%?

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Why are you talking about “historically”?

And while we’re on the subject of “why”, why do you keep trying to compare 10% of the population to 75%?

I’m not. 10% should have always received, at least, proportional funding… not 75% of the funding.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

Why are you talking about “historically”?

And while we’re on the subject of “why”, why do you keep trying to compare 10% of the population to 75%?

I’m not. 10% should have always received, at least, proportional funding… not 75% of the funding.

What? You are:

@PurpnGold

Compared to white universities? Peanuts.

You do it constantly.

Why should 75% fund any for the 10%?

10% of what should have received funding “in proportion” to what?

What’s the proportion now?

[zantax]

@PurpnGold

Define “conservative values”

I am not the one trying to shoehorn century old party platforms into today’s ideological paradigm. Both of them are so far from today’s left, no valid comparison is possible. Like is it on the left or the right to want to increase tariffs when tariffs were how the government was funded?

Nah, you guys just want to label them conservatives to try and wash the stink of slavery off of the Democratic party.

Pee ew

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

The thing is though, the inner cities are not in the suburbs. We are talking about the state of the inner cities.

Right. White flight from the cities into suburban homeownership leaving behind a class that was cut out from that benefit.

The largest asset that most people have is their house. White families were able to get that asset in the 40’s and 50’s … an asset that in a lot of cases tripled in value by the early 70’s.

So by the time the fair housing act passed… the people who were cut out from getting in on the ground floor was priced out.

They were relegated to be a renter class and not an owner class.

Lack of home ownership is not a factor in inner city blight. Virtually everyone living in urbania rents, even in cities whose core has not rotted.

Why do you think those wealthy white people fled the cities?

Now that the Fair Housing Act (1968) is enacted, why don’t blacks flee the cities too?

It was already explained.

Others had a near two decade head start in home ownership

But the problem with inner cities began more than 50 years ago …

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@zantax

@Jezcoe

@Samm

The thing is though, the inner cities are not in the suburbs. We are talking about the state of the inner cities.

Right. White flight from the cities into suburban homeownership leaving behind a class that was cut out from that benefit.

The largest asset that most people have is their house. White families were able to get that asset in the 40’s and 50’s … an asset that in a lot of cases tripled in value by the early 70’s.

So by the time the fair housing act passed… the people who were cut out from getting in on the ground floor was priced out.

They were relegated to be a renter class and not an owner class.

Umm, they would have made a grand total of twenty k on a home held from 1950 until 1970 on average. And that is adjusted for inflation.

1950’s Levittown was $7,000-$8,0000 a house. Vets put no money down.

By 1977 a Levittown house was $36,000.

That is a government subsidized investment that was restricted from a certain type of person from getting in on it.

Levittown was a unique situation. It is not applicable to the situation in most large cities that are suffering from urban blight of their cores.

[Samm]

1964 Ancient history with regard to race issues.

[Samm]

@WuWei

@zantax

Damnable Democrats.

Racism is not partisan.

But accusation of racism often is.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

But the problem with inner cities began more than 50 years ago …

Okay… then why are there inner city problems?