We can go round and round, denouncing people who “propagate loathsome, false narratives,” but it’s kookism, not hate speech.
In the article you cited, the prosecution admits they think Jones does not really believe his own propaganda. Is it any different when people on shows like “The View” say nasty hateful things about Republicans, Christians and Conservatives, that are false?
The legal complaint says Jones does not believe the shooting was a hoax, but nevertheless he has repeatedly accused Sandy Hook families of faking their family members’ deaths.
"The Jones defendants concoct elaborate and false paranoia-tinged conspiracy theories because it moves product and they make money," the suit alleges. "Not because they truly believe what they are saying, but rather because it increases profits."
If people and groups making up crazy “false paranoia-tinged conspiracy theories” is hate speech, the people claiming Trump is a traitor who colluded with Russia, are all guilty too.
During the 2016 election campaigns, there were a lot of hateful things said about Trump, and his “deplorable” supporters, which probably incited the mobs of Bernie and Hilary supporters to chase down and beat Trump supporters. Hateful talk that could incite more of those people to violence still goes on today. Should Facebook and Google purge the material posted by those people too?
I’m not defending Jones, he is disgusting for saying those things. I’m worried about where this stuff is heading to. Now we have members of Congress suggesting this purge is crucial to our democracy:
Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., is calling on other tech companies to ban more sites like InfoWars, and says the survival of American democracy depends on it.
“Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart. These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it,” Murphy tweeted Monday.