Anti ISIL Operation Kills Leader in Idlib

[Borgia_dude]

@Samm

He may have pulled the trigger too soon. The retaliatory embassy bombing will probably happen just as campaigning revs up.

The last high profile killing (Sulemaini) you supported. Odd.

[FreeAndClear]

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

That is how it has always worked in the past, isn’t it?

May be. But what if he was targeted because he was the leader of a mass murdering group and is therefore a mass murderer. Is that a good reason?

What will change? Do they have a shortage of mass murderers to replace him?

I certainly shed no tears that he’s dead, but your celebration is for what? What will change?

Those were your words for when the last isil leader was killed. So the question remains what changed

[Borgia_dude]

It seems the logic here changes for mysterious reasons but here it is by year.

2017-2020 kill terrorist leaders
2021-2024 don’t kill terrorist leaders
2025-2029
- if Trump (or GOP) wins re-election: kill terrorist leaders
- else: don’t kill terrorist leaders

[Samm]

@CanadianJudo

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

That is how it has always worked in the past, isn’t it?

May be. But what if he was targeted because he was the leader of a mass murdering group and is therefore a mass murderer. Is that a good reason?

What will change? Do they have a shortage of mass murderers to replace him?

I certainly shed no tears that he’s dead, but your celebration is for what? What will change?

Attacking the leadership of ISIL makes them easier for our partners on the ground to maintain their borders.

those partners being the Kurdish free state known as the nation of Rojava.

That wasn’t the question.

[Samm]

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

He may have pulled the trigger too soon. The retaliatory embassy bombing will probably happen just as campaigning revs up.

The last high profile killing (Sulemaini) you supported. Odd.

Soleimani was an Iranian military officer who targeting US troops in Iraq. What did this guy do to us?

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

That is how it has always worked in the past, isn’t it?

May be. But what if he was targeted because he was the leader of a mass murdering group and is therefore a mass murderer. Is that a good reason?

What will change? Do they have a shortage of mass murderers to replace him?

I certainly shed no tears that he’s dead, but your celebration is for what? What will change?

Those were your words for when the last isil leader was killed. So the question remains what changed

No it wasn’t. As I just told your buddy, Soleimani was an Iranian military officer who was targeting US troops in Iraq, not an ISIS (or ISIL) terrorist. I have no idea who the last ISIS leader we killed was, but nothing has changed has it. Killing terrorist leaders may bring smug satisfaction, but it changes nothing. It’s like playing whack-a-mole.

[FreeAndClear]

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

That is how it has always worked in the past, isn’t it?

May be. But what if he was targeted because he was the leader of a mass murdering group and is therefore a mass murderer. Is that a good reason?

What will change? Do they have a shortage of mass murderers to replace him?

I certainly shed no tears that he’s dead, but your celebration is for what? What will change?

Those were your words for when the last isil leader was killed. So the question remains what changed

No it wasn’t. As I just told your buddy, Soleimani was an Iranian military officer who was targeting US troops in Iraq, not an ISIS (or ISIL) terrorist. I have no idea who the last ISIS leader we killed was, but nothing has changed has it. Killing terrorist leaders may bring smug satisfaction, but it changes nothing. It’s like playing whack-a-mole.

No you didn’t. You called him a mass murderer and if nothing else that’s why he should have been assassinated. I quoted you.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@Samm

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

He may have pulled the trigger too soon. The retaliatory embassy bombing will probably happen just as campaigning revs up.

The last high profile killing (Sulemaini) you supported. Odd.

Soleimani was an Iranian military officer who targeting US troops in Iraq. What did this guy do to us?

Clearly progs here don’t understand - or care about - the difference.

[Samm]

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

@FreeAndClear

@Samm

That is how it has always worked in the past, isn’t it?

May be. But what if he was targeted because he was the leader of a mass murdering group and is therefore a mass murderer. Is that a good reason?

What will change? Do they have a shortage of mass murderers to replace him?

I certainly shed no tears that he’s dead, but your celebration is for what? What will change?

Those were your words for when the last isil leader was killed. So the question remains what changed

No it wasn’t. As I just told your buddy, Soleimani was an Iranian military officer who was targeting US troops in Iraq, not an ISIS (or ISIL) terrorist. I have no idea who the last ISIS leader we killed was, but nothing has changed has it. Killing terrorist leaders may bring smug satisfaction, but it changes nothing. It’s like playing whack-a-mole.

No you didn’t. You called him a mass murderer and if nothing else that’s why he should have been assassinated. I quoted you.

No I didn’t what? Even a general can be a mass murderer.

I wonder what we would find if we dredged up your posts from 3+ years ago.

[Samm]

@Call_me_Ishmael

@Samm

@Borgia_dude

@Samm

He may have pulled the trigger too soon. The retaliatory embassy bombing will probably happen just as campaigning revs up.

The last high profile killing (Sulemaini) you supported. Odd.

Soleimani was an Iranian military officer who targeting US troops in Iraq. What did this guy do to us?

Clearly progs here don’t understand - or care about - the difference.

Yep. And notice not one of them has responded to my question as to whether they agreed with me now or whether they agree with me now? All the did was go to a lot of bother to dredge up quotes from more than three years ago which were made in regard to what was a very different occasion. Libs.

[FreeAndClear]

I quoted your baghadadi comment and your comment about this new isil leader. They were polar opposites. But anyway go ahead dredge away.

[Samm]

Soleimani.