why what? Not sure what you are saying?
Allan
Why there is an immigration âstand offâ.
No need for quotation marks. It is a stand off.
why? Nobody is willing to compromise.
like you. you dont want a path to citizenship for DACA people. there is no compromise in that stance. How bout a way to admit some of the DACA into american citizenship?
Allan
I never said I didnât want a âpathway to citizenship for DACAâ, I said there already is one. Always has been.
Trump will give you DACA. What are you going to give?
Money for the Trumpâs wall. the offer was already on the table and was passed on by the President.
Allan
What were the conditions on the money?
https://mobile.twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1070707041663107078
Yeah, Trump probably should have done the deal with Schumer if they had the votes. Kelly seems to have messed that one up. And then the judiciary said Trump couldnât cancel DACA anyway.
Donât blame one side. They are all complicit.
No but I do believe it was over a few years (dems hope they will oust him in 2020 and then wall funding would go bye bye)
Allan
did I say otherwise. Hence the need for a compromise.
Allan
Best thing to do is let the people who want all of the third world to come to America is to let those people house and pay for the migrants while they are waiting for the asylum date and they are responsible for them showing up at their hearing. I want to see how far the bleeding hearts last, when itâs their dime and not on the backs of everyone else.
Iâve seen pictures of all the human trafficking going on.
No, there shouldnât be a different processâŚequal protection under the law and such. Thatâs not to say they should be booted from the country and required to enter the legal way, but the process itself should be applied as it is to anyone else. No special treatment.
See what I was saying about temporary concessions? Why would I agree to this, especially after what happened to Reagan?
1 Like
which is why we have this immigration mess, the unwillingness to compromise a solution.
it will continue for a long time. sad to say.
Allan
Iâm sorry, compromising on a fundamental ideal, like equal protection, should be a no-go from the start. A simple program that would protect these folks from being booted from the country so long as they follow the legal process anyone else would be subjected to is more than a reasonable compromise in this regard. As you said earlier, these folks didnât make a conscious choice to enter the country illegallyâŚbut why should that give them a leg up over those who have made the conscious choice to enter LEGALLY?
Not a leg up, an assist.
There are 4 classes of immigrants in my opinion.
- Totally illegal-consciously broke American immigration law
- Asylum seekersâfollowing the rules of American asylum seekers
- Legal immigrantsâfollowed the rules and let into the country.
- DACA illegalsâfollowed totally illegal parents into the country
Now you want to lump 1 and 4 together. Thatâs not a good idea.
Allan
You want to lump them all into #3.
Nope. I want 3,4,2,1 dealt with each in different way.
Allan
No you donât.
There must be thousands of prosecutions for human trafficking by the Trump administration⌠oopsâŚ
