Anonymous letter from Berkeley history professor rips BLM narrative

You guys promote an “anonymous” letter from an unverified twitter account promoting a blog that says what you want to hear.

What did I get wrong? Why wouldn’t I laugh at that?

2 Likes

Yes, truths told by a Berkeley professor that doesn’t exist.
Zero shame.

1 Like

Of course.

We’ve been told here on an almost daily basis that anonymous sources aren’t reliable.

:sunglasses:

1 Like

The devote radical socialist would be an uncle tom

1 Like

proof please

1 Like

And?

She just isn’t smart… being conservative doesn’t mean you aren’t smart. She is a terrible representation of what a black conservative can be.

Let me look for a “do you like Candace Owens” poll. Her ideas are “conservative” so off the bat she only has at best 10% support.

A major part of assessing content is the author and any bias or motivation they might have. An anonymous 4chan post does not allow either of those things.

You can fact check and analyze 4chan posts all you want. I don’t. I don’t care how special and insightful people might thank it is. Same reason I don’t fact check and analyze National Enquirer articles.

2 Likes

this isnt a source of news

walk it off

1 Like

There are threee black professors of history at the school none of their past work relates to this letter in anyway.

Read the thread. Surely you can do it better than those “inner city blacks”.

1 Like

It’s an opinion.

You don’t know that.

You actually believe that garbage quote?

“. . . MLK would likely be called an Uncle Tom if he spoke on our campus today .“

thanks for your opinion

You don’t know that either.

Yes we do. We did research and stuff.

1 Like

First, appeals to authority are useless, second, not even a proven authority.

They aren’t claiming Bigfoot or UFO.

That’s an odd distinction.

One not used when TRUMP supporters dissed “Anonymous” who has written several opinion pieces (read…NOT NEWS) of Trump.

No you don’t. You did assumptions and stuff.

1 Like