Ann Coulter sinks to a new low (and for her that's pretty bad)

[madasheck]

@merickson

@madasheck

Maybe … just maybe … we all could take a lesson from McCain’s life and his idea that bipartisanship is a good thing. I suspect, though, that there are some who will resist because they think there’s no room to move. Your comment indicates that.

My impressions is that liberals have problems with bipartisanship, not because libs think that cons are completely wrong, but because liberals think that libs are so very very right.

Conservatives have problems with bipartisanship not because they think that cons are completely right, but they think that libs are very very very wrong.

I think those of us on the left are much more open now to bipartisanship than the right because so much of the right has swung to the far (alt) right. You can see examples of it in this thread how steadfast they are.

[Konssurvative1]

What an asinine thing to say. Show some respect.

[johnwk2]

@madasheck

Maybe … just maybe … we all could take a lesson from McCain’s life and his idea that bipartisanship is a good thing.

Reaching across the aisle and bipartisanship is Washington Newspeak to subvert the Constitution and screw the American People.

JWK

First it was McCain’s No Child Left behind Act, and then it was McCain’s No Alien sent back home scheme ___ our one party gang in Washington is corrupted to the core!

[TheRedComet]

Jeez it hasn’t even been a week yet.

[Apocalypto]

Ladies and gentlemen, trump’s America.

[merickson]

@madasheck

@merickson

@madasheck

Maybe … just maybe … we all could take a lesson from McCain’s life and his idea that bipartisanship is a good thing. I suspect, though, that there are some who will resist because they think there’s no room to move. Your comment indicates that.

My impressions is that liberals have problems with bipartisanship, not because libs think that cons are completely wrong, but because liberals think that libs are so very very right.

Conservatives have problems with bipartisanship not because they think that cons are completely right, but they think that libs are very very very wrong.

I think those of us on the left are much more open now to bipartisanship than the right because so much of the right has swung to the far (alt) right. You can see examples of it in this thread how steadfast they are.

Bipartisanship is inhernetly attractive to the party that doesn’t control three branches of government.

[SimplyTrying]

Backup post:

Some people exist for the single purpose of being as evil as they possibly can be.

[johnwk2]

@Apocalypto

Ladies and gentlemen, trump’s America.

What a clever way to avoid refuting my post or disagreeing with its content.

JWK

The unavoidable truth is, the Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ and Andrew Gillum’s socialist plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@gooddad409

@CaughtInTheMiddle

@Apocalypto

Trump huggers, they never disappoint.

Think about how much more class and humanity that Obama and his family have than Trump and his family, white supremacists and Trump Republicans. It’s like comparing Eli Manning to Pacman Jones or somebody really bad like Aaron Hernandez (when you consider murders by white supremacists).

Yeah Obama had a lot of “humanity” when he selected 2 pro abortion Supremes that kept Roe the law of the land which resulted in millions more babies being killed.

He showed a lot of “humanity” when he instigated division among the races, economic classes and every other way he could think of to divide. (Alinsky style)

He may have been a faithful spouse but his policies were a disaster when you consider humanity or morality.

you can’t even get your New York City con man and adulterer to nominate justices to overturn RvW. he instead nominates someone that will protect him against prosecution from his lawbreaking.

so stop trying to convince people that Trump, white supremacists or Trump republicans have more class and humanity than the Obama family. you just look stupid with those posts.

oh, and still no post from you about Ann’s comment. not surprising.

[madasheck]

@merickson

@madasheck

@merickson

@madasheck

Maybe … just maybe … we all could take a lesson from McCain’s life and his idea that bipartisanship is a good thing. I suspect, though, that there are some who will resist because they think there’s no room to move. Your comment indicates that.

My impressions is that liberals have problems with bipartisanship, not because libs think that cons are completely wrong, but because liberals think that libs are so very very right.

Conservatives have problems with bipartisanship not because they think that cons are completely right, but they think that libs are very very very wrong.

I think those of us on the left are much more open now to bipartisanship than the right because so much of the right has swung to the far (alt) right. You can see examples of it in this thread how steadfast they are.

Bipartisanship is inhernetly attractive to the party that doesn’t control three branches of government.

The fact that it was part of McCain’s makeup proves you are wrong.

[johnwk2]

@madasheck

@merickson

@madasheck

@merickson

@madasheck

Maybe … just maybe … we all could take a lesson from McCain’s life and his idea that bipartisanship is a good thing. I suspect, though, that there are some who will resist because they think there’s no room to move. Your comment indicates that.

My impressions is that liberals have problems with bipartisanship, not because libs think that cons are completely wrong, but because liberals think that libs are so very very right.

Conservatives have problems with bipartisanship not because they think that cons are completely right, but they think that libs are very very very wrong.

I think those of us on the left are much more open now to bipartisanship than the right because so much of the right has swung to the far (alt) right. You can see examples of it in this thread how steadfast they are.

Bipartisanship is inhernetly attractive to the party that doesn’t control three branches of government.

The fact that it was part of McCain’s makeup proves you are wrong.

McCain’s bipartisan approach proves he was not a Republican, and was disloyal to his oath of office to support “this Constitution”. He was more interested in imposing his socialist views of fairness, justice and reasonableness as the rule of law.

JWK

"The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." – Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968

[madasheck]

@johnwk2

@madasheck

@merickson

@madasheck

@merickson

@madasheck

Maybe … just maybe … we all could take a lesson from McCain’s life and his idea that bipartisanship is a good thing. I suspect, though, that there are some who will resist because they think there’s no room to move. Your comment indicates that.

My impressions is that liberals have problems with bipartisanship, not because libs think that cons are completely wrong, but because liberals think that libs are so very very right.

Conservatives have problems with bipartisanship not because they think that cons are completely right, but they think that libs are very very very wrong.

I think those of us on the left are much more open now to bipartisanship than the right because so much of the right has swung to the far (alt) right. You can see examples of it in this thread how steadfast they are.

Bipartisanship is inhernetly attractive to the party that doesn’t control three branches of government.

The fact that it was part of McCain’s makeup proves you are wrong.

McCain’s bipartisan approach proves he was not a Republican, and was disloyal to his oath of office to support “this Constitution”. He was more interested in imposing his socialist views of fairness, justice and reasonableness as the rule of law.

JWK

_ (snip)

It’s this kind of talk we as a nation don’t need. It’s not bringing us together.

[DougBH]

What’s also disgusting is the large number of politicians and pundits who are exploiting McCains death for political purposes.

[madasheck]

@DougBH

What’s also disgusting is the large number of politicians and pundits who are exploiting McCains death for political purposes.

You’re humiliating yourself with these comments.

[DougBH]

Nope. JUst not caving to the sharks.

[Adam]

Yeah that Meghan girl and some of the pallbearers were way out of line.

[johnwk2]

@johnwk2

@madasheck

@merickson

@madasheck

@merickson

@madasheck

Maybe … just maybe … we all could take a lesson from McCain’s life and his idea that bipartisanship is a good thing. I suspect, though, that there are some who will resist because they think there’s no room to move. Your comment indicates that.

My impressions is that liberals have problems with bipartisanship, not because libs think that cons are completely wrong, but because liberals think that libs are so very very right.

Conservatives have problems with bipartisanship not because they think that cons are completely right, but they think that libs are very very very wrong.

I think those of us on the left are much more open now to bipartisanship than the right because so much of the right has swung to the far (alt) right. You can see examples of it in this thread how steadfast they are.

Bipartisanship is inhernetly attractive to the party that doesn’t control three branches of government.

The fact that it was part of McCain’s makeup proves you are wrong.

McCain’s bipartisan approach proves he was not a Republican, and was disloyal to his oath of office to support “this Constitution”. He was more interested in imposing his socialist views of fairness, justice and reasonableness as the rule of law.

JWK

"The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." – Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968

@madasheck

It’s this kind of talk we as a nation don’t need. It’s not bringing us together.

Truth and facts do not set people free?

JWK

First it was McCain’s No Child Left behind Act, and then it was McCain’s No Alien sent back home scheme ___ our one party gang in Washington is corrupted to the core!

[Auto129]

Lawyer Thoughts

[mobulis]

@Call_me_Ishmael

So …tell me again how she denigrated a hero?

By doing it.

[Forcefield]

@merickson

My impressions is that liberals have problems with bipartisanship, not because libs think that cons are completely wrong, but because liberals think that libs are so very very right.

Conservatives have problems with bipartisanship not because they think that cons are completely right, but they think that libs are very very very wrong.

What a dumb conclusion to reach in a thread on a conservative political forum where liberals are having to defend the honor of a dead conservative.