That you condone this type of behavior just goes to show that you are fine with it as long as it’s your side doing it. That is not a good look for anyone. That is party before country.
If you will read through this thread almost every member on the left uses the excuse well they didn’t do it. Believe me the next time it happens it could be your side of the aisle it happens to and they will probably go even farther than they did this time. And because you condoned the behavior you will have no reason to complain when it happens to a president you support.
That’s cool. Doesn’t mean it isn’t awfully suspicious for involvement with Russia’s illegal activities. So suspicious that it couldn’t be ignored.
But hey, you said the whole thing was invented. Right? Now it’s not invented, it’s just totally legal and totally cool.
Why would I look silly? I didn’t bumble my way into a two year investigation.
2 Likes
Voting for Trump would be possibly the dumbest way to show DC that you don’t like that behavior. Hope you keep that in mind next year.
What faceplanting? You’ve just provided ample evidence to contradict your own point.
Show the evidence. Not speculation. Show where the FBI have provided proof of hard evidence. No one so far has been charged with working with the Russians. Show your proof that they have hard evidence that the Trump campaign worked with the Russians. Not what you want to believe. Show the court cases and hard evidence.
No more supsicious than any of the contacts democrats were having with the Russians, particularly in light of Hillary’s previous work on their behalf.
She got a free pass however due to the bias.
Considering the Russian government was aggressively working against the election of Clinton, it’s kinda hard to be suspicious the Russian government were coordinating those illegal activities with their campaign.
So yes, far far more suspicious.
Freerick a former dean of Fordham Law School, is one of the chief architects of the 25th Amendment helped get it through Congress in the early 1960s. He said that the senators who signed the provision into law specified that declaring the president unfit must rely on reliable facts regarding the president’s physical or mental faculties not personal prejudice
. If you read the debates, it’s also clear that policy and political differences are not included, unpopularity is not included, poor judgment, incompetence, laziness, or impeachable conduct none of that, you’ll find in the debates in the congressional record, is intended to be covered by Section IV Feerick said.
That was the only way to show the people in DC that they were tired of the same old crap in DC.
Why do you think so many on the right went crazy with the election of Trump. He proved that they could be replaced by people outside of their group. That the people would vote for something different when they got tired of not having their voices heard.
Why do you think the teaparty was so demonized and believe me we are still here and we are still working to make changes. They panicked because we sent all sorts of new members to the house. Members who ran on not staying in DC until they died. Members who had a life outside of politics.
The “same old crap” you were tired of was apparently people having a single shred of decency.
Sorry, but you were sick of politicians demonizing groups of people, you made things far worse by voting for the guy who feels no remorse doing so.
That kind of bolsters my point.
No one knew about the ongoing investigation into the Trump campaign… but the public knew about the investigation into Clinton’s Emails.
It is hard to argue that they “cooked up” something to prevent Trump from being the President if they never told the public about it until after the election.
It just shows how devious the Deep State is.
Doing nothing before the election was a brilliant strategy to prevent Trump from winning the election
Whoa Nellie!
Actually, the asset is directed.
Lisa Page left on her own! 
She just up and quit to go sit in a cabin by a lake and contemplate the meaning of life.
There would be massive protests and that means eventually rioting, as the two factions clash, eventually.
M
I can’t say why she left but it was probably a smart move rather than put up with the nut jobs.
She can make far more in private sector anyway.
You must have a lower opinion of the right than me. I don’t see them as violent thugs. Sometimes they talk a big game but at the end of the day they’re not willing to be criminals.
These seem at odds.
They were aggressively working against both sides to give us exactly what we’ve had ever since election day, a US in turmoil and tearing itself apart.
Congrats for helping them succeed.
