Nope.
Gang of 8 is 4 Dems and 4 Republicans. The highest ranking members of the Senate and House and the highest ranking members of both intelligence committees.
Lindsey isn’t in the club.
Nope.
Gang of 8 is 4 Dems and 4 Republicans. The highest ranking members of the Senate and House and the highest ranking members of both intelligence committees.
Lindsey isn’t in the club.
At that time, the “Gang of Eight” included Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Richard Burr (R-NC), then-House Speaker Paul Ryan, then-House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes (R-CA), and their Democratic counterparts — Chuck Schumer (NY), Mark Warner (VA), Nancy Pelosi (CA), and Adam Schiff (CA), respectively.
Nunes refused to raise an objection in the room, but seemingly had no problem running to the white house to help Trump obstruct.
Your first sentence belies the reality of the situation. It wasn’t “trumped up matters” (hate that phrase). There was most definitely sufficient reason to investigate. His bromance with Putin and Michael Flynn were two solid reasons.
And I started reading Andrew McCabe’s book last night (bought it on Kindle). So far, an excellent book and a deep look into the workings of the FBI.
Guntsu:There is ample reason for Trump and his campaign to have been investigated as evidenced by his lies over his business connections to Russia, the Trump tower meeting which they lied about and now the conviction of his former campaign manager and national security adviser over their lies about their connections with Russians.
An investigation is entirely reasonable…
No, it is not–especially not when the accusations of lying were unreasonable. Yes, the President is a bombastic, hyperbolic speaker, even pompous. Those are his characteristics, his personality. Even so, it is not that difficult to understand what he is saying if people will simply listen to the man and to what is going on. Do you know what he is guilty of? How dare a person who is not a politician run for office! He is outside of the box and D.C. feels that is exactly where he should have stayed. People have their place! And they should stay in them (says D.C.).
But you’re playing judge here saying the investigation was “unreasonable.” No it wasn’t, and they wouldn’t know that at the early stages of investigation anyway. That it continued is proof it wasn’t.
Who the hell do those guys think they were? Talking about reversing an election?
That’s so arrogant I can only assume collective insanity and megalomania.
That’s not what happened except in the world of fake media.
Bomberfox:You guys wanted this. I remember the posts, the glee in people’s eyes at the thought of triggering the libs.
We wanted a bunch of psychopath megalomaniacs attempting a coup?
That’d be strange since there’s one in the Oval Office.
Cratic3947: Bomberfox:You guys wanted this. I remember the posts, the glee in people’s eyes at the thought of triggering the libs.
We wanted a bunch of psychopath megalomaniacs attempting a coup?
That’d be strange since there’s one in the Oval Office.
No, she lost. She killed tens of thousands and laughed about it. Did you want to see the tape again?
BigBear: Cratic3947:Who the hell do those guys think they were? Talking about reversing an election?
That’s so arrogant I can only assume collective insanity and megalomania.
They suspected, rightly, that the ■■■■■■■■■ you voted for was acting in Russia’s interests, against the interests of the US. They were doing what they should have: investigating a threat, discussing options. You should be glad.
You have not seen 1 ounce of proof of that and you never will… It’s a hate crime hoax too.
And what was O’l Flexible talking about with Putin for after the election?
You’re bending this every which way but loose. Stick with the real media for real information.
madasheck: Cratic3947: Bomberfox:You guys wanted this. I remember the posts, the glee in people’s eyes at the thought of triggering the libs.
We wanted a bunch of psychopath megalomaniacs attempting a coup?
That’d be strange since there’s one in the Oval Office.
No, she lost. She killed tens of thousands and laughed about it. Did you want to see the tape again?
She didn’t kill anyone except in the imagination of the fake news media.
Cratic3947: BigBear: Cratic3947:Who the hell do those guys think they were? Talking about reversing an election?
That’s so arrogant I can only assume collective insanity and megalomania.
They suspected, rightly, that the ■■■■■■■■■ you voted for was acting in Russia’s interests, against the interests of the US. They were doing what they should have: investigating a threat, discussing options. You should be glad.
You have not seen 1 ounce of proof of that and you never will… It’s a hate crime hoax too.
And what was O’l Flexible talking about with Putin for after the election?
You’re bending this every which way but loose. Stick with the real media for real information.
The real information is anyone who thinks that’s what the 25th A was about should not have this much power gov as they are poorly educated.
BigBear: Cratic3947:Who the hell do those guys think they were? Talking about reversing an election?
That’s so arrogant I can only assume collective insanity and megalomania.
They suspected, rightly, that the ■■■■■■■■■ you voted for was acting in Russia’s interests, against the interests of the US. They were doing what they should have: investigating a threat, discussing options. You should be glad.
You have not seen 1 ounce of proof of that and you never will… It’s a hate crime hoax too.
Yes, I’ve seen plenty of evidence of that. Anyone who doesn’t see it at this point simply doesn’t want to, or is motivated to deny it.
The real information is anyone who thinks that’s what the 25th A was about should not have this much power gov as they are poorly educated.
I think I got what you meant there, but the 25th was posted earlier in this thread. That’s all you need to know.
I’d love to see that crusty lapdog try to subpoena someone for suggesting a constitutional remedy. Go balls out.
McCabe says Rosenstein was behind seeking this 25th amendment remedy and Rosenstein and the DOJ say McCabe is lying.
Don’t you think it is a good idea to find out whether the current assistant AG or the former head of the FBI is the bigger liar?
SimplyTrying:Oh please. Being concerned about our country is not “conspiring”. Such hyperbole. And I don’t think the jury ruled on the “duly elected” part.
that’s what voting is for…anything more than that means you believe your will is more important than the will of the people and that my friend…is treasonous.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Stop applying it to people you just disagree with.
The real information is anyone who thinks that’s what the 25th A was about should not have this much power gov as they are poorly educated.
As a loyal Trump supporter, you should be cautious about tossing around terms like “poorly educated”.
His words, not mine.
Cratic3947: BigBear: Cratic3947:Who the hell do those guys think they were? Talking about reversing an election?
That’s so arrogant I can only assume collective insanity and megalomania.
They suspected, rightly, that the ■■■■■■■■■ you voted for was acting in Russia’s interests, against the interests of the US. They were doing what they should have: investigating a threat, discussing options. You should be glad.
You have not seen 1 ounce of proof of that and you never will… It’s a hate crime hoax too.
Yes, I’ve seen plenty of evidence of that. Anyone who doesn’t see it at this point simply doesn’t want to, or is motivated to deny it.
You can’t point to one scintilla of evidence… The list of fake " we got him now" stories is immense by now. Remember when you all thought he sent Cohen to lie to congress, or Flynn contacted the Russians before the election… Almost all fake news and almost every lefty believed it.
Just like most they got Smolleted with another hate crime hoax this week…
Bomberfox:I’d love to see that crusty lapdog try to subpoena someone for suggesting a constitutional remedy. Go balls out.
McCabe says Rosenstein was behind seeking this 25th amendment remedy and Rosenstein and the DOJ say McCabe is lying.
Don’t you think it is a good idea to find out whether the current assistant AG or the former head of the FBI is the bigger liar?
Yes. Given the conflicting accounts, I’d call it a reasonable line of inquiry. We should have confidence that the public statements DOJ officials are truthful.
That said, this is a nothing burder. Regardless of what was said by who, no crime was committed.
You can’t point to one scintilla of evidence…
SDNY prosecutors laid out the factual case that Individual-1 (Trump) directed Cohen to make payments that constituted felony campaign finance violations.
That’s a flotilla all by itself.
Cratic3947:You can’t point to one scintilla of evidence…
SDNY prosecutors laid out the factual case that Individual-1 (Trump) directed Cohen to make payments that constituted felony campaign finance violations.
That’s a flotilla all by itself.
And where’s the Russians?
Phaedrus: Cratic3947:You can’t point to one scintilla of evidence…
SDNY prosecutors laid out the factual case that Individual-1 (Trump) directed Cohen to make payments that constituted felony campaign finance violations.
That’s a flotilla all by itself.
And where’s the Russians?
And whoosh… there go the goalposts.