Ignore their new house leader as well who denies any number of elections.
How many Democratic election deniers held up election certifications and cost their own party while doing it? They will have gotten what they deserved if they did that.
I’m also already on the record that Hakeem Jeffries shouldn’t have been rewarded with a leadership spot (this is answering @gooddad409 ’s post).
Yes we know, it’s (d)ifferent.
1 Like
Yes, I think Lake is going that exact route. My understanding is its a timing issue for her? For example, AZ law requires that the certification is completed first, then the contesting election complaint can be filed in the appropriate court transpires.
It’s not weird, it’s habitual. 
1 Like
Reduced to sloppy attempts at imitation. No concept of comedic delivery what-so-ever. Very sad to see happen. 
1 Like
No it’s not different…without proof, election denialism is wrong.
But I then went on and said if Dem election deniers let their denialism cost their own party seats, then they got what they deserved,
In any event, Cochise County’s concerns were addressed. The two firms were certified to inspect and approve the machines. In order to get their certification revoked would have required a state act revoking them, which never happened.
That the renewed certificate wasn’t posted on the website was a clerical error. I’m sure you believe that is a lie…but again…what is true is the two companies did what was needed to have their certifications renewed (on the record) and again, it would take state act to revoke their certifications, which didn’t happen.
But you keep doing you. And Cochise County can keep doing them…and lose the GOP one House seat because of it.
Look how quickly Hakeem got a pass.
“Oh, that’s not good, but oh well.”
1 Like
Well to be fair, if democrats actually stopped voting for election deniers there wouldn’t be any elected democrats.
1 Like
It is in point of fact extremely funny that the GOP coukd lose what could easily have been a critical House seat because you guys were, you know, lying about voter fraud for no other reason than to assuage Donald Trump’s fee-fees and now people really believe it.
If Libs ever stopped voting for election deniers, it would indicate them having enough brains to vote for who they want rather than they’re told. lol
Another way the Arizona GOP shot themselves in the foot…
The response blamed prominent Republicans, including party chair Kelli Ward, for sowing confusion by telling supporters on Twitter not to place their ballots in a secure box to be tabulated later by more robust machines at county elections headquarters.
Good…stupid should hurt…and this time, it’s actually hurting the stupid.
Struck a nerve. You are well away of the unprovable cheating that is happening with the mail in ballots and now with the election day scanners set to read poorly.
How about we clean this up. That is the only way to stop the symbolic ringing in your ears.
2 Likes
Unprovable cheating?
Printers printing to light and the voters allowed to cast ballots that were then counted on a different tabulator at a central processing location or hand counted? Oh the horrors!!!
WW
1 Like
How can one be aware of something that is unprovable?
How does that work?
1 Like
I will mention again that there are several counties…many of them Republican dominated…, in Arizona where placing the ballot in Door 3 for later counting at a central location IS the actual means of casting a ballot.
But somehow if it’s the method used to overcome a machine malfunction, it’s rife with fraud.
I never get tired of this because the Help America Vote Act of 2002, implemented in 2006, not only already contains most of the safeguards y’all claim don’t exist but has to virtually everyone’s surprise created the most secure voting system in American history.
Turns out linking your SSN to voter ID makes large scale fraud basically impossible. 2020 is the cleanest American election ever, it’s not even close, they drilled down to the precinct level in like a dozen states and found virtually zero fraud.
I have a related question:
Say for a moment cheating did occur…… just pretend. … after the absentee envelopes are opened and separated from the ballot/destroyed, what evidence would there be?
1 Like
The “both siding” of election denials is pretty weak, IMO. Sure there are dem politicians who questioned elections, esp in 2016. But when you compare that to the scale and pervasiveness of election denials in the Republican Party, it’s nowhere close. Denying election results is basically a given in a lot of GOP circles these days. I mean … Jan 6th.
If that happened, how would we be aware of it?
PS I can tell you the safeguards that are in place to prevent what you are hypothesizing from happening…mostly through the use of bar coding and other tracking.
But my question still stands…if the cheating was unprovable, how would we be aware of it?
