You’d think the general counsel for the fbi would maybe take copius notes when someone presents him with “evidence” that the presidential candidate from one the two major parties was colluding with the enemy.
The joke being that before she got fired in the Watergate era for being unethical she helped argue that saying that to Congress could constitute perjury.
I recall wishing someone would nail her ass to the wall over perjury for saying that.
Next republican pres, congress etc needs to gut funding to FBI and CoJ…do away with about 2/3rds and let it die on a vine. They’re more dangerous then criminals IMO.
So, measuring Durham’s performance by the outcome in United States v. Sussmann would be a mistake. Also, especially in the case of an acquittal, it would ignore the valuable information exposed related to the broader Spygate scandal.
None of which has to be proven in court.
Oh and also a lot of what’s going on was shady as hell. If nothing else it exposes how dirty campaigns in general are and how dirty the Hillary campaign was. I mean that.
Reports are Durham is going to prove the russian contact was paid by the HIllary Camp to make up stuff about Trump and the FBI knew it and used the dossier anyway! …