But they would likely say that the person made the choice to cross the border and therefore arent innocent (which of course has nothing to do with the fact that they are human)
Except you havent described an alternative of how we should derive values. Youve only asserted your own values that you have. Thats what we were trying to discuss.
I can make the case that this was an innocent, moral choice that we only now consider immoral because we (analagous to the mother in the abortion example) decided we had the power to decide which of the vulnerable foreigners (analagous to the unborn) was allowed to “come out the womb” into our country, and which weren’t.
The vulnerable foreigner in a poor country is just desperately doing what he can to survive…he has no say in the laws that were written to close off a survival option for him. That was made by people far more powerful than he.
The pro-lifer may very well be killing many of them by cutting off an avenue of survival because we have decided we value preserving our territorial integrity and preserving our standard of life rather than helping them.
Please provide a quote of you describing your philosophical position of how values are derived or please repeat. Not what values you currently have. Otherwise, youre again just making assertions.
Of course it was. We have slaves in this very country. Sex workers. Domestics. It’s illegal, and people get prosecuted for it.
By some measures we have as many slaves in this country today than we had at the peak of antebellum days.
All the same, I’m profoundly grateful that our forefathers made it illegal. And except for people who still use or peddle slaves today, our entire nation – both pro-lifers and abortion rights advocates – are equally grateful.