Adam and Steve- Here we go again

[WuWei]

You should be banned from the internet for that.

[Sknyluv]

@WuWei

Sounds to me like a lot of people are sitting around waiting for government to grant them permission to exercise what they believe is a right.

Interesting.

As opposed to doing what exactly?

[bigtwnvin]

I’m old. Sometimes you just have to find the hilarity.

[GWH]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Egos so fragile that simply being disgusted by what two consenting adults do is worthy of state/federal action.

Yeah. Whatever. Make it a right.

Let the verbal lashings begin!

[WuWei]

@Sknyluv

@WuWei

Sounds to me like a lot of people are sitting around waiting for government to grant them permission to exercise what they believe is a right.

Interesting.

As opposed to doing what exactly?

Making it a right.

[gooddad409]

This is all a distraction from Brandon’s disasterous economic and foreign policies.

The dems (such as Pelosi and Shumer) throw it out there and the woke libs lap it up.

[Publius]

The SCOTUS didn’t MAKE it a right. They said it was a right that was already there. Until they changed their minds after several generations of Americans relied on that right for half a century.

[SixFoot]

@WuWei

Doesn’t exist. It’s not the “right to marry”, it’s state recognition of the union.

If you want it to be a right, make it a right. Pass an amendment, then you won’t have to worry about.

Hell, I’ll vote for it just to stop the whining.

God forbid this country should function as intended, huh?

[SixFoot]

@bigtwnvin

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

So lesbians are cool then.

Hot ones, very.

Yeah baby!

[WuWei]

@Publius

The SCOTUS didn’t MAKE it a right. They said it was a right that was already there. Until they changed their minds after several generations of Americans relied on that right for half a century.

Yes, they did. And now it isn’t because you did it wrong. Ratify an amendment.

[komobu]

@Sknyluv

The fundamental right to marry.

A Gay man can marry whatever woman he wants, as long as she will have him. What’s the problem?

[komobu]

@WuWei

What do you think would happen if you passed an amendment?

Im not sure enough states will ratify it. Thats the problem when the pols try to implement something too soon, before they have the vast support of the electorate.

If they tried to pass a constitutional right to marry outside of ones race, the vast majority of the electorate would support it and it would pass without problems. I see this was the main issue with Row v Wade. They did not have the vast support of the electorate.

[komobu]

@WuWei

No, the SCOTUS did. @Sknyluv is not wrong and I understand the frustration.

Correct, but it appears to me that @Sknyluv does not support the court correcting themselves and that is the issue.

[Optrader]

Isn’t it great? What “ rights” man grants, man can take away. Libs should be happy their system is working!

On the bright side, they are making states uphold the second amendment. Adam and Steve’s right to keep and bear arms is being un-infringed!

[WuWei]

@komobu

@WuWei

No, the SCOTUS did. @Sknyluv is not wrong and I understand the frustration.

Correct, but it appears to me that @Sknyluv does not support the court correcting themselves and that is the issue.

@Sknyluv doesn’t like the outcome. This time.

[tnt]

@bigtwnvin

Is there a “right” in the US Constitution that guarantees homosexuality or a homosexual lifestyle?
Why should Congress be tasked with legislating a lifestyle choice?

Ditto for heterosexuality.

[tnt]

@Bill.in.PA

The government should be supporting stable families, not doing everything it can to destroy them.

Here are some things that would help stabilize families:

• Higher minimum wage
• subsidized child care
• stronger unions
• paid maternity and paternity leave
• UHC

Do you support them?

[WuWei]

Government cheese.

[tnt]

@komobu

I see this was the main issue with Row v Wade. They did not have the vast support of the electorate.

A vast majority of americans think abortion, with some restrictions, should be legal.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@komobu

I see this was the main issue with Row v Wade. They did not have the vast support of the electorate.

A vast majority of americans think abortion, with some restrictions, should be legal.

Good, then the amendment should be easy to pass.

“Some restrictions” is hypocrisy.