If being supah smaht means convincing all these poor schmucks that buy into this nonsense to give up even trying to get a girl because they think they’re too ■■■■■■■ genetically and evolutionarily inadequate to even have a shot, I’ll happily be a dumbass.
1 Like
Run of the mill lib.
you’re the one to judge him wrong?
Killing expertise.
You haven’t read it.
I have read evolutionary biologists reactions to his works.
Haidt’s work in how the emotion comes first and the reasoning comes later is rooted in applied science. It isn’t anything new, but has built upon other works.
His moral foundations work is applying a value scale that he created in order to carry out the tests that he was testing that value scale on.
He created a new fangled way of saying Id, ego and superego. Like that, I doubt that his moral foundations work will stand the test of time because it is so incredibly, incredibly squishy.
He is smart. Smarter than me.
So was Linus Pauling. He was wrong about Vitamin C.
Isn’t wikipedia grand?
Don’t like the mirror, huh?
Wut?
I mean
Wut?
1 Like
Oh. You think that I got this from Wikipedia?
Ummmm nope.
I read his book when I was in my phase of learning what I could about cognition. His book was among several that I read in that subject. His stuff is interesting, but to me it doesn’t hold too much water when one goes into it beyond the surface.
That is usually the problem in any grand theory to explain the big stuff.
I understand. Have a nice day.
Lol.
This was a funny post.
1 Like
And if the Dems win the election, the same will be said about you.
What’s your PhD in?
