[quote=“AZslim, post:100, topic:236247”]
I see. I wasn’t asking you. You were asking me. So what you were thinking has no relevance. I prefer thinking for my self thankyouverymuch.
[quote=“AZslim, post:100, topic:236247”]
I see. I wasn’t asking you. You were asking me. So what you were thinking has no relevance. I prefer thinking for my self thankyouverymuch.
WuWei:Has any evidence been forthcoming that any of the 9 contracted the virus at the rally?
Just curious, what would that evidence look like?
Ask the OP. He’s the one who implied it in this thread.
[quote=“altair1013, post:101, topic:236247, full:true”]
altair1013: AZslim:Then why participate in a political forum?
[/quote]For fun.
I was thinking of another word.
I see. I wasn’t asking you. You were asking me. So what you were thinking has no relevance. I prefer thinking for my self thankyouverymuch.
Guess what? I don’t care if you were asking me or not. It’s fun here.
How many people attended those rallies? If there were as many as usually show up, and only 9 tested positive, maybe the rallies are a cure.
How many people attended those rallies? If there were as many as usually show up, and only 9 tested positive, maybe the rallies are a cure.
In order to get 9 positives at a Biden rally pretty much everybody there would have to get infected.
That was my thought as well.
9 out of 10-15 thousand is impressive for NOT spreading.
Will that one person in ICU get the same cure as Trump?
Like Chris Christie.
Allan
Borgia_dude: WuWei: Borgia_dude: WuWei:Has any evidence been forthcoming that any of the 9 contracted the virus at the rally?
Just curious, what would that evidence look like?
I don’t know, what are your thoughts?
You asked for evidence, I’m just wondering what sort of evidence you would find convincing.
Willing to look at anything that shows causation.
And what might that look like? Seriously, I am wondering what evidence you think suffices. Quit beating around the bush.
I’m not beating around the bush. What do you have? I’ll look at it.
Even then they’re all news crew.
Even then they’re all news crew.
And then there is that.
I’m not beating around the bush. What do you have? I’ll look at it.
So you have no idea what evidence would convince you. Do you think such evidence exists at all then?
WuWei:I’m not beating around the bush. What do you have? I’ll look at it.
So you have no idea what evidence would convince you. Do you think such evidence exists at all then?
I’m waiting to see something.
Borgia_dude: WuWei:I’m not beating around the bush. What do you have? I’ll look at it.
So you have no idea what evidence would convince you. Do you think such evidence exists at all then?
I’m waiting to see something.
How do you think the experts trace a transmission back to its source?
WuWei: Borgia_dude: WuWei:I’m not beating around the bush. What do you have? I’ll look at it.
So you have no idea what evidence would convince you. Do you think such evidence exists at all then?
I’m waiting to see something.
How do you think the experts trace a transmission back to its source?
That’ll work, what have you got?
Borgia_dude: WuWei: Borgia_dude: WuWei:I’m not beating around the bush. What do you have? I’ll look at it.
So you have no idea what evidence would convince you. Do you think such evidence exists at all then?
I’m waiting to see something.
How do you think the experts trace a transmission back to its source?
That’ll work, what have you got?
So means the experts use will suffice as evidence?
WuWei: Borgia_dude: WuWei: Borgia_dude: WuWei:I’m not beating around the bush. What do you have? I’ll look at it.
So you have no idea what evidence would convince you. Do you think such evidence exists at all then?
I’m waiting to see something.
How do you think the experts trace a transmission back to its source?
That’ll work, what have you got?
So means the experts use will suffice as evidence?
Maybe, let’s look at it. You’ll forgive me if I’ve lost a bit of blind faith in “experts” in the past 7 months on this topic.
You seem to be saying that you have nothing…FWIW.
Were any of the 14,000 “infested” at the rally?
Are you suggesting that 14,000 people standing shoulder to shoulder and massless have just the same chances of contracting Covid as 14,000 people wearing masks and socially distancing?
I just don’t understand the pass being given to trump for holding these rallies in this way. Most people on this site have expressed how they are taking simple precautions like wearing masks and distancing when appropriate, and yet many of these same people scoff at the idea that getting thousands of people together in tight quarters, mostly massless, somehow undermines the work they are doing to lessen the spread of a virus that is crippling the country.
I don’t get it.
I don’t get it.
That’s because you’re one of those internet libs that knows hundreds of thousands of people who have caught the Kung Flu, whereas I’ve yet to meet just one person who has had it.