I know people who are supposed to be the most premiere, scientifically, professional people in the world who claimed the Pfizer vaccine had a 95% efficacy rate. Now they changed it to that it gives you a greater chance of not being hospitalized and dying.
This continues to evolve and some of what was said prior, is now not deemed true. The vaccine has not proven itself to have a 95% efficacy rate and there was NO mention of a booster when it was first introduced. All I’ve done is extend out a pattern that’s beginning to appear. It may or may not go that way but that’s the direction that appears most probable.
No…the point is, I always have to look out down the road, surmise what I’m seeing, connect the dots, prepare for what you believe lies ahead and be profitable when that day arrives cuz you were right. I just shared with you that skill set regarding the vaccine. Now…say thank you Smyrna.
I was responding the the assertion that we would need a booster for the rest of our lives. I simply stated that there is yet no evidence for that. Will we need more boosters? Yeah, maybe. Will we actually need an annual shot, an 8th month shot, or whatever. I simply suggested that the science is not in for an indefinite future,
But if is true that annual jabs will be advised, what’s the big deal.