There does seem to be a big out break of squirmy tantrums.
Silly, but also entirely predictable and on-brand, at this point.
Like selling vaccine on death instead of mitigating the ill effects of Covid.
This would change if D really wanted everyone vaccinated.
Confused libs may very well believe that they want everyone vaccinated, but the 'rats they voted for aren’t done milking them yet.
Silly, but also entirely predictable and on-brand, at this point.
It is wild how Joe Rogan has poisoned the conversation so so much.
I am home right now for the 3rd day with a fever of 99.9 and have an appointment today at 1:30 to get a molecular COVID test, even though I’ve been vaccinated. If I am infected, those antibodies are worth more than the vaccine. You do understand that…correct?
Lemme know how that test turns out so I can get your Kung Flu badge ready.
Sorry to hear if the vaccine failed miserably. I know some great therapeutics though, peer-reviewed and all.
SixFoot: gooddad409: SixFoot: DougBH:Getting a liberal Democrat to say ivermectin is like getting a vampire to discuss garlic.
Yep. Their egos are battered and beaten by their own toxicity. No internal fortitude to get better, no hope, just the solace of an angry jackass on TV screeching what they want to hear.
Well you are giving them a huge case of heartburn because their narrative/goal is to keep people scared to death through the mid terms so as to keep massive mail in voting going with all those delightful opportunities for voting irregularities otherwise they are toast in the mid terms and they know it.
Plus if Covid is brought under control there is no longer an excuse to try and control everyone.
Congrats on a great thread.
Behold their squirmy tantrums in the face of being so wrong, in spite of how many other people’s books they claim to read.
There does seem to be a big out break of squirmy tantrums.
It’s the DU Variant.
tnt:So strange to have to argue the validity of science behind vaccine studies with someone who is vaccinated.
You can read exactly what they did. It’s not as you describe.
What is strange is that even if folks have been vaccinated they are also open to investigation of other areas that may or may not be helpful.
We still have a lot to learn about this virus. I’d think you’d welcome having an open mind.
If you have a vitamin D deficiency, you certainly don’t seem to mind folks taking supplements but according the the logic of some, just getting the vaccination will cover that, too.
I’ve had both vaccinations and i still want some hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectine around myself just in case i do get it.
I think early treatment is much smarter than being sent home to see what happens if one does get it.
I have a niece who got the covid a couple of weeks ago. She started taking hydroxychloroquine after a day or so. Her voice returned within hours and all her congestion was gone in a couple of days.
She tested covid free yesterday.
The libs want us to toe the lib narrative no questions asked. For political reasons mostly.
So… the people who are saying that as many people as possible should get vaccinated are the one’s who really want the pandemic to continue.
Just wild.
Years ago, I remember reading an article by this psychiatrist who spent a lot of time dealing with people who had hallucinations and various neurological disorders. One day, in a small group, she just decided to run with their delusions: What are you hearing? What’s happening now? Why is the giant mechanical owl coming to eat us? How are the aliens trying to communicate?
That’s what being on this site is like, a lot.
Smyrna:I am home right now for the 3rd day with a fever of 99.9 and have an appointment today at 1:30 to get a molecular COVID test, even though I’ve been vaccinated. If I am infected, those antibodies are worth more than the vaccine. You do understand that…correct?
Lemme know how that test turns out so I can get your Kung Flu badge ready.
Sorry to hear if the vaccine failed miserably. I know some great therapeutics though, peer-reviewed and all.
The studies on Ivermectin did not survive peer review. All of the data has been preprint.
Sooo, you wanna try one more time in saying “Ivermectin Helped” or is that still beyond your current capabilities?
I will say this - I sure hope it helped, because that would mean one more tool int eh tool box. Current research does not indicate it does, but perhaps they will study this area of the world and we will learn differently.
Your turn - did the vaccines help beat down the virus in India?
gooddad409: SixFoot: gooddad409: SixFoot: DougBH:Getting a liberal Democrat to say ivermectin is like getting a vampire to discuss garlic.
Yep. Their egos are battered and beaten by their own toxicity. No internal fortitude to get better, no hope, just the solace of an angry jackass on TV screeching what they want to hear.
Well you are giving them a huge case of heartburn because their narrative/goal is to keep people scared to death through the mid terms so as to keep massive mail in voting going with all those delightful opportunities for voting irregularities otherwise they are toast in the mid terms and they know it.
Plus if Covid is brought under control there is no longer an excuse to try and control everyone.
Congrats on a great thread.
Behold their squirmy tantrums in the face of being so wrong, in spite of how many other people’s books they claim to read.
There does seem to be a big out break of squirmy tantrums.
It’s the DU Variant.
So strange to have to argue the validity of science behind vaccine studies with someone who is vaccinated.
You can read exactly what they did. It’s not as you describe.
What did they do then? “Placebo” was your word. That’s what a placebo is - a psychological tool.
I’m not arguing the validity of science. I’m discussing your blind faith in the science dogma and lack of critical thinking.
The studies on Ivermectin did not survive peer review.
That must be why India decided to use it on a massive scale the way they did.
Trust the libs instead, folks. They read books.
Current research does not indicate it does, but perhaps they will study this area of the world and we will learn differently.
Not research. Concensus.
What did they do then? “Placebo” was your word. That’s what a placebo is - a psychological tool.
I’m not arguing the validity of science. I’m discussing your blind faith in the science dogma and lack of critical thinking.
■■■■■■■■■
You are arguing that decades old vaccine study protocols do not accurately describe a vaccines efficacy.
Jezcoe:The studies on Ivermectin did not survive peer review.
That must be why India decided to use it on a massive scale the way they did.
Trust the libs instead, folks. They read books.
The preprint data looked good.
It was fraudulent though. It is based on two large studies that are frauds.
It didn’t survive peer review.
Jezcoe:The studies on Ivermectin did not survive peer review.
That must be why India decided to use it on a massive scale the way they did.
Trust the libs instead, folks. They read books.
Don’t forget they listen to TV man as well.
Loony Toony…
Not research. Concensus.
Consensus based on research.
I’ve had both vaccinations and i still want some hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectine around myself just in case i do get it.
I think early treatment is much smarter than being sent home to see what happens if one does get it.
I have a niece who got the covid a couple of weeks ago. She started taking hydroxychloroquine after a day or so. Her voice returned within hours and all her congestion was gone in a couple of days.
She tested covid free yesterday.
The libs want us to toe the lib narrative no questions asked. For political reasons mostly.
I think folks do need a Covid plan.
Here, if your oxygen level is above 90 they send you home. That really isn’t a plan.
I don’t think folks have any clue on how to deal with this if it hits them or a loved one.
Maybe, that would be a great thread topic rather than just get the vax.