So you presented evidence and judges(in 50+ cases) said evidence were phony or won’t stand up in court. What the hell do you the judges to do about it? Get real evidence. It’s the plaintiff job to provide good and real evidence.
All that’s left for Trump’s adoring base are fevered dreams of massive fraud that only he, they, and maybe Graham and Cruz can see.
There was no massive fraud. Biden will be sworn in as our 46th President on 20 January; hopefully with a GOP controlled Senate.
He needs that fevered base for the grift. He and his Krappy Kids live elite and pampered lives off of his sad donors, who probably never look to see where their money goes.
Suggestion noted and discarded.
Trumpism and conservatism were two different things, right up until cons threw their near universal support behind Trump. They are inextricably merged until enough cons display the wisdom and courage necessary to honestly assess and correct how they sold their principles out to a liberal coastal elitist in exchange for 4 years of WH control.
Right now even Pyrrhus is in Hades shaking his head - “Damn, now that was costly.”
1 Like
Some do, they keep sending “billionaire” Donald Victim Trump weekly checks
It is the sign of the times that your statement, while absolutely correct, is hardly heard coming from the others on the right.
And more:
“It has been.” 
And:
The judge looked at the evidence. It failed.
1 Like
It’s sort of like paying alimony to an abusive ex-spouse, isn’t it?
So there’s evidence now?
Getting the FEC up and running again will be awesome.
A legend in his own mind.
To all the historians this sore loser presidency will be a failed one.
Not as bad as Buchanan but right above him on the loser table.
Allan
Yes, exactly. That’s the conclusion you should take away. Massive win.
Bigly.
Having reviewed the caselaw and plaintiff’s allegations, the Court concludes it has jurisdiction to resolve plaintiff’s claims, at least to the extent they rest on federal law, specifically the Electors Clause. And, on the merits of plaintiff’s claims, the Court now further concludes that plaintiff has not proved that defendants violated his rights under the Electors Clause. To the contrary, the record shows Wisconsin’s Presidential Electors are being determined in the very manner directed by the Legislature, as required by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. Plaintiff’s complaint is therefore dismissed with prejudice.
I didn’t see anything about evidence being presented. Just facts of the case being agreed to by both sides. Based on those facts, which were, again, agreed to by both sides, the arguments were found moot. Seems like the case was pretty much done before it got to the evidentiary phase to me. If there was ever any actual evidence to be presented anyway.
Not really. Most on the right have accepted the results and have already moved on.
i rememer a time when the GOP claimed to be america first. instead now they are all hail king trump.
they are nothing more than seditious traitors
Trump is America.
L’etat c’est moi
This is the prevalent mindset of conservatives at present. Trump will forever live in their hearts and minds as champion, alpha male, and now martyr.
Change my mind.
