Oh God no, that’s not even remotely close to a “fact.” It’s no wonder you’re confused about these matters.
For example, Obama led the effort to save the domestic auto industry from collapse, against strong opposition from conservatives. Where would the current US economy be if GM had been allowed to go belly up, taking down the entire supply chain and dealership network and other supporting businesses with it?
Nope- told you exactly why your methodology was wrong and gave you hints as to how you would would properly find a comparison period to trump’s first 18 months in office.
But as I said, if you couldn’t be bothered to understand it, I can’t be bothered to repeat it.
In any case, are you trying to make the case that single action will now go down in history as the single thing that will be responsible for everything good that ever happens in our economy for the foreseeable future?
Exactly. Not to mention Obama came after a major lost.
Trump numbers are far more impressive. And as more people enter the labor force…more money going into social security and medicare as Trump said last night rally.
My methodology was sound. I use it every day in my professional life. You did nothing to demonstrate anything but a misunderstanding of how to apply statistics as a means to interpret historical data.