Your incorrect reading. SCOTUS is correct.
OHSA is constitutional.
Allan
âAgriculture and manufacturing involve the production of goods; commerce encompasses traffic in such articles.â ___ See U.S. vs. Lopez
JWK
Why have a written constitution approved by the people if those who it is designed to control are free to make it mean whatever they wish it to mean?
I donât think this is about people know what they should do on a hot day. I think itâs about employers not letting their employees do what they should do on a hot day.
4 Likes
Yes John, I am well aware of your thoughts on this type of thing, and I reject your analysis in full. Virtually everybody else rejects it as well. I am confident that ignoring you is the right move here.
Exactly. As SneakySFDude dude posted earlier, enforcement is the point.
Incidentally, it doesnât need to be a hot day. Hot conditions. A factory, a mine, a smelting plant: extreme heat can exist in those places as well.
Wise choice seeing how OSHA has been around for 52 years
And congressional regulatory power has been around even longer than that.
My thoughts? You confuse my posting the documented intentions and beliefs of those who framed, and the people who adopted the Constitution, as being my thoughts. Of course, instead of pointing to the wording in our Constitution granting such regulatory power, you deflect.
JWK
What makes a Supreme Court opinion legitimate is when it is in harmony with the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text.
NoâŚyour thoughts.
But most of us are well aware how you enjoy pretending you have a bead on the Constitution that no one else does which you feel is best exemplified by repeatedly creating Large Walls Of Text.
LolâŚ
Has OSHAâs constitutionality been challenged at all in its 52 years?
Most of it is so bizarre I normally ignore them
Seems to me the SC recently confirmed OSHA exceeded its authority.
JWK
1 Like
Surely even you can grant a little bit of literary license for ease and brevity of posting.
No. I reject in full. And the vast majority of people and lawmakers agree with me.
On 1 rule. Iâm taking about OSHA itself
The Supreme Court recently confirmed OSHA exceeded its authority. Try paying attention to what is happening around you.
JWK
On 1 rule. Did they rule OSHA itself unconstitutional? No? They didnât? Weird
Sure. And they may do so again. But the elements of NFIB will be vastly different from the elements of a challenge here.
Furthermore, the challenge wasnât to the existence of OSHA, just to whether or not they exceeded their authority.
And in this thread a specific rule is being talked about.
So, where is the wording in our Constitution granting such regulatory authority over the subject matter in question?
And then you tried claiming that OSHA itself was unconstitutional. I asked you if that has ever been challenged in court but you seem unable to answer
Now were applying the law? Since when did that matter to libs? Oh yeah, only when it promotes their agenda. Iâm sorry, I forgot liblaw.
1 Like
