So you are okay with winning at any cost?

If Bill Clinton was an idiot and didn’t even pretend to be remorseful about his behavior, he might have been 10% as bad as what we are now seeing with Trump.
I knew this was going to trigger some of you.

So you are okay with winning at any cost?
Soooooooooo……………………
Another Never-Trumper who likes to recite empty platitudes about morality and Country before party.

SaysWho:
So you are okay with winning at any cost?
Soooooooooo……………………
Another Never-Trumper who likes to recite empty platitudes about morality and Country before party.
They aren’t empty. I’ve never said country before party. We only have one party you can vote for if you have any sense of morality right now, so it’s sort of a meaningless phrase.
How you choose to live your life is up to you.

If clinton had a lobotomy he might have been more like trump…
The contrast of trump and clinton proves the old adage that you cant buy class and charm…
Yeah. Because class is getting fellatio in the oval office and ruining a blue dress.

vaard:
If clinton had a lobotomy he might have been more like trump…
The contrast of trump and clinton proves the old adage that you cant buy class and charm…
Yeah. Because class is getting fellatio in the oval office and ruining a blue dress.
It’s not. I never thought we’d have a more personally despicable president than Bill Clinton. I never thought you guys would actually support Donald “grab 'em by the ■■■■■■ Trump.

It’s not. I never thought we’d have a more personally despicable president than Bill Clinton. I never thought you guys would actually support Donald “grab 'em by the ■■■■■” Trump.
has he done or said that in the white house?

SaysWho:
It’s not. I never thought we’d have a more personally despicable president than Bill Clinton. I never thought you guys would actually support Donald “grab 'em by the ■■■■■” Trump.
has he done or said that in the white house?
No. But he did defend the murderers of Heather Heyer. Does that count for anything?

No.
Didn’t think so.

SaysWho:
No.
Didn’t think so.
You missed some of my post there. I wonder why?

You missed some of my post there. I wonder why?
Not related to my point, therefore useless waste of bandwidth. Once you conceded my point I was done. No need to go down another rabbit hole.

They aren’t empty. I’ve never said country before party. We only have one party you can vote for if you have any sense of morality right now, so it’s sort of a meaningless phrase.
How you choose to live your life is up to you
Sooooooooo……………………
The answer is the DEMs. Those squeaky clean DEMs who are looking to impose socialism on Americans.
Excuse me while I pick myself up off the floor from laughing so hard.

SaysWho:
They aren’t empty. I’ve never said country before party. We only have one party you can vote for if you have any sense of morality right now, so it’s sort of a meaningless phrase.
How you choose to live your life is up to you
Sooooooooo……………………
The answer is the DEMs. Those squeaky clean DEMs who are looking to impose socialism on Americans.
Excuse me while I pick myself up off the floor from laughing so hard.
You have been lied to if you think you support the less corrupt of the two parties. But I suspect you are okay with that because your reasons for supporting Republicans are too deep-rooted to change.

You have been lied to if you think you support the less corrupt of the two parties. But I suspect you are okay with that because your reasons for supporting Republicans are too deep-rooted to change
By who exactly?
How should I know where you got your false beliefs from?

How should I know where you got your false beliefs from?
Ironic.
…

How should I know where you got your false beliefs from?
So DEMs have it right and everyone else is wrong?
No. We’re just less wrong than Republicans.
Sometimes when I read these threads, I forget that Clinton was elected before most Americans even had cellphones and internet. Yet, he’s used to justify the behavior of a president in the smartphone age