I already did. You’re lecturing me on something that was specifically in the post you responded to.
Try reading my posts next time before launching into your walls of text.
You confuse my posting facts with “lecturing”.
JWK
They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
The bottom line questions are:
Does our federal Constitution guarantee that the right to vote in federal elections, shall not be infringed upon? And if the answer is yes, is it not our Supreme Courts’ job to adjudicate allegations when the right to vote has been infringed upon, e.g., a state purposely adopting voting regulations and procedures which allow and invite an infringement upon the right to vote by illegal cast ballots canceling out legally cast ballots?
JWK
We need to call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
^
.
My Guy Lost <> Illegally Cast Votes.
.
.
.
.Sorry, but some people are still working through the stages of grief.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS
I see you never answered the questions:
Does our federal Constitution guarantee that the right to vote in federal elections, shall not be infringed upon? And if the answer is yes, is it not our Supreme Courts’ job to adjudicate allegations when the right to vote has been infringed upon, e.g., a state purposely adopting voting regulations and procedures which allow and invite an infringement upon the right to vote by illegal cast ballots canceling out legally cast ballots?
JWK
We need to call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
The Constitution does not guarantee the right to vote for President. That is solely up to the States. If the State decides to apportion electors by popular vote, the individual state decides how ballots are cast and what the voting rules are. Provided that 1) the vote is allowed to anyone over 18 (26th Amendment); 2) the vote is not denied on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude (15th Amendment) or sex (19th Amendment); and there is no poll tax (24th Amendment), and there are no equal protection violations (Reynolds v. Sims (1964) (striking down state law giving rural voters more voting power than urban voters); Harper v Virginia Board of Elections (1966)(applying 24th Amendment to state election); etc., then the states can run the elections anyway they want. Plain and simple.
And the constitution allows for the regulation of the state elections by the federal government.
If you think Biden is anyway shape for form a radical socialist revolutionaries he is a donor puppet and donors = more capitalism in USA so rich can make more money off crony capitalism then you are type voter Liberty323 is talking about in this thread.
The ‘radical, socialist revolutionary’ nonsense, though it works in arousing folks, comes no where near explaining the many, many many uber-wealthy Democrats in my community. Big time capitalists.
We go ‘racist, homophobic, xenophobes’, they go ‘radical socialist revolutionaries’. Same ignorance, different name-calling.
Trump has the rule of law and the Construction on his side, Biden has a bunch of liars!
1 Like
If you look into this a little more deeply, you’ll find that the Federal government has very limited authority to direct the elections for President. It is far more extensive as to Congress.
When I said the Federal government, I meant Congress.
Thank you for your opinion.
The fact is, our federal constitution, in explicit wording and in several instances, forbids the right to vote to be abridged. Are you suggesting this guarantee is not federally enforceable?
JWK
We need to call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
The only places where those guarantees appear are the 15th, 19th, 24th and 25th amendments, which is what
I said.
And? What is your point? Are you suggesting our federal government does not have jurisdiction to insure the right to vote is not abridged?
JWK
We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
1 Like
How many electors does Biden have certified so far? What happens if he doesn’t have 270 by the deadline?
A swarm of liars. There are a hell of a lot of them.
1 Like
Right this second - he has 110 that have certifed.
That includes NV, NM, GA, MN, MI, PA, and VA.
So what states is he gonna stop from certifing? Lets take out AZ and WI (although they will certify - lets pretend there is actually a chance they won’t. What other states do you think may not certify?
Because add NY, CA, NJ, CO, MD, WA, CT, RI, HI, IL and thats 270 (throw in NH and HI) and thats 278
None of those states are even being challenged. So give me your latest fantasy. What do you see happening that stops Biden from getting 270.
And remember -I didnt even include AZ (Who certifies Monday) or WI (Who certifies Tuesday).
1 Like
