Yes. Insuring only legal votes are counted is a federal question

.

Our federal Constitution commands that the people of each state vote for their electors and their electors vote for the President.

Our Constitution by its 14th Amendment provides a penalty for any abridgement of the right to vote making any abridgement federally protected.

By our Constitution’s 15th Amendment, the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, making this right federally protected.

By the 19th Amendment the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex making any abridgement federally protected.

By the 24th Amendment The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reasons of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

And by the 26th Amendment, the right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of age.

So, what actually constitutes an abridgement of the right to vote which is federally protected as stated above?

If a State’s employees who count election results are free to count illegal ballots ___ ballots which do not meet the States voting requirements and restrictions ___ would that constitute an “abridgement” of the federally protected right to vote? The answer to this question is a resounding ‘Yes”, as each illegal ballot would in effect cancel out a Citizen’s legally presented ballot and thus be an infringement.

So, to protect against such infringements, should our federal courts require, when an appropriate request is made, that all ballots be inspected by representatives of each political party to insure each ballot is a legally counted ballot?

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

2 Likes

Why did the poll workers cover the windows in Detroit so no one could observe their work?

JWK

Democrat-ran cities and states are ran like banana republics.

John…I hope you don’t mind but I added the question you pose, to my thread too.

1 Like

Maybe because the people in that crowd don’t meet the requirements set by the state to be poll watchers.

1 Like

And here is what happens in those banana republics where elections are also rigged:

JWK

Poll watcher doesn’t mean can look in a window.

1 Like

The poll watcher weren’t watching through the window - they were inside.

The angry mob outside aren’t poll watchers.

3 Likes

So poll watcher statutes are irrelevant. Now you are saying they covered the windows because they were an angry mob, where can I see evidence this is accurate? I don’t see any signs of agitation or disorder in the photo a couple posts up.

2 Likes

Funny I see Pa state supreme court say no…they have no right to observe ballot count.

There is no “poll watcher” statute in Michigan that allows anyone to watch the counting.

As for the windows - maybe you shouldn’t take everything you see on the internet at face value. Use your Google.

1 Like

Every state has their own laws regarding poll watchers.

1 Like

And the federal government has jurisdiction to insure there are no infringements regarding the right to vote, which obviously includes that all ballots be inspected by representatives of each political party to insure each ballot is a legally counted ballot!

What is your point?

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

There is not single state that allows poll watchers to “inspect each ballot”.

Poll watchers can observe the process, but they are not allowed to examine the ballots themselves.

And that is the subject of the thread in case you missed it!

Yes. Insuring only legal votes are counted is a federal question.

So, what is your point?

JWK

Our communist/socialist domestic revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.

So states have right do as they please…got it.

The Supreme Court is not going to eliminate the secret ballot because of vague unsubstantiated claims of illegal voting.

What did I believe? I asked a question.

Not quite, but close enough.

Of course. You’re just asking questions.

You have to realize we can all see through that. If you had actually wanted to know the answer to your “question”, it would have taken 30 seconds to Google it.

But questions are more helpful than answers, when you’re trying to muddy the waters.

4 Likes