As long as it’s someone else who is paying for it I’m all for it . . .
Am I right?
What happens when the super rich all leave the country? Tax tax tax . . . that’s all most liberals can think of (except for the low income erners then it’s give give give.)
Not their responsablility to “be nice” and pay for everything.
Free healthcare (unless your super rich)
Free education (unless your super rich)
Free child care (unless your super rich)
Free housing (unless your super rich)
Free food (unless your super rich)
Free transportation (unless your super rich) (How else are the poor going to get around when the new green deal jacks fuel prices to $13+ a gallon, and the only electricity is from renewables that are not reliable.)
The wealthiest and most powerful country to ever exist on the planet not being able to provide the most basic of comforts for it’s citizenry because of an ideological worship of the really wealthy is one of the most bizarre things that I could ever think of.
Raising taxes on the rich doesn’t preclude taxes on the poor. In my opinion everyone should pay at least some amount, so healthcare, etc., wouldn’t be “free” for anyone.
This argument seems particularly dumb to me. Free Healthcare for everyone would by definition include free healthcare for the super rich. Unless you’re arguing the super rich somehow aren’t included in the basic collection of mankind.
Everyone needs to pay their share, and the rich do not.
Let me put this in simple terms. Poor won’t pay anything for their healthcare. Supper rich with pay their share, the poor’s share, and some of the middle class share for their “free healthcare”.
If everyone paid, say, 10% of their income would that be acceptable? Everyone pitching in appropriate to their earnings, no one paying a higher percentage than anyone else.