What they espouse is not liberalism.
Or maybe youâre caught in a time warp? This from Wikipedia.
Under the leadership of Jimmie Ă kesson, the SD underwent a process of reform by expelling hard-line members and moderating its platform. Today, the Sweden Democrats officially reject both fascism and Nazism.
No question that happens.
But many in the Swden Democrats actually ARE Neo-NazisâŚthe party was founded by them.
Jezcoe:
The world is upside down.
Or maybe youâre caught in a time warp? This from Wikipedia.
Under the leadership of Jimmie Ă kesson, the SD underwent a process of reform by expelling hard-line members and moderating its platform. Today, the Sweden Democrats officially reject both fascism and Nazism.
News flash- the neo-Nazis are back.
Second news flash- they never really went awayâŚjust were forced into the background.
The government should provide a social media platform that follows these guidelines. A public option for internet services should satisfy all sides of this issue.
But many in the Swden Democrats actually ARE Neo-Nazis
Nope.
Under the leadership of Jimmie Ă kesson, the SD underwent a process of reform by expelling hard-line members and moderating its platform. Today, the Sweden Democrats officially reject both fascism and Nazism.
Jezcoe:
The world is upside down.
Or maybe youâre caught in a time warp? This from Wikipedia.
Under the leadership of Jimmie Ă kesson, the SD underwent a process of reform by expelling hard-line members and moderating its platform. Today, the Sweden Democrats officially reject both fascism and Nazism.
Ahh⌠now you are taking the time to learn who Breitbart was holding up.
Yeah⌠keep reading about them past the Wikipedia.
JayJay:
But many in the Swden Democrats actually ARE Neo-NazisâŚthe party was founded by them.
Nope.
Under the leadership of Jimmie Ă kesson, the SD underwent a process of reform by expelling hard-line members and moderating its platform. Today, the Sweden Democrats officially reject both fascism and Nazism.
News flash- theyâre back.
I beat you to posting this by several posts- because I knew it would be posted as a âdefenseâ.
News flash- theyâre back.
In your dreams.
I beat you to posting this
I beat you to telling you what your actual posts would be about. Please refer to post #1.
They want to force a private platform to carry their speech for free.
Twitter said Soyluâs tweet, as well as another from the weekend that used the same phrase, violated its rules about hateful conduct. The site said it did not take down the posts because there was potential public interest in keeping them accessible.
Emphasis mine.
Deviant:
someone or something that deviates from a normespecially : a person who differs markedly (as in social adjustment or behavior) from what is considered normal or acceptable
Merriam-Webster
I think this is the way to handle it, although a case can be made that the dictionary definition fits. It is obvious what his intent was.
Notice they didnât ban him or even remove the post.
The government should provide a social media platform that follows these guidelines. A public option for internet services should satisfy all sides of this issue.
Not needed. Public accommodation laws are in effect.
JayJay:
News flash- theyâre back.
In your dreams.
Iâm pretty sure my ability to research matters exceeds yours.
Itâs been proved many times on these boards.
But thanks for your concern. ![]()
No question that happens.
But many in the Swden Democrats actually ARE Neo-NazisâŚthe party was founded by them.
And the Democrat Party here was founded by racists. So what?
JayJay:
No question that happens.
But many in the Swden Democrats actually ARE Neo-NazisâŚthe party was founded by them.
And the Democrat Party here was founded by racists. So what?
Which Democratic Party?
There have been several.
![]()
WuWei:
JayJay:
No question that happens.
But many in the Swden Democrats actually ARE Neo-NazisâŚthe party was founded by them.
And the Democrat Party here was founded by racists. So what?
Which Democratic Party?
There have been several.
The Democrat Party here.
JayJay:
WuWei:
JayJay:
No question that happens.
But many in the Swden Democrats actually ARE Neo-NazisâŚthe party was founded by them.
And the Democrat Party here was founded by racists. So what?
Which Democratic Party?
There have been several.
The Democrat Party here.
There have been several here as well.
Should fascist speech and philosophy be repressed in a liberal society?
Especially if it is not illegal? And if it is not illegal, should it be made so?
Jezcoe:
They want to force a private platform to carry their speech for free.
Twitter said Soyluâs tweet, as well as another from the weekend that used the same phrase, violated its rules about hateful conduct. The site said it did not take down the posts because there was potential public interest in keeping them accessible.
Emphasis mine.
Deviant:
someone or something that deviates from a normespecially : a person who differs markedly (as in social adjustment or behavior) from what is considered normal or acceptable
Merriam-Webster
I think this is the way to handle it, although a case can be made that the dictionary definition fits. It is obvious what his intent was.
Notice they didnât ban him or even remove the post.
Twitter can carry any speech that it wants.
It can even apply itâs standards unevenly.
Their playground⌠their rules.
People donât like it⌠make their own playground.
If their opposition uses the successful U.S. model, the populists will be labeled as âwhite supremacists.â As the democratic party loves to do here.
I am not surprised that a political party that has a neo Nazi problem would want to force private platforms to carry their message.
Not surprised at all.
InterestingâŚand yet so predictable.