What caveat have I employed?
It makes sense and you know it. Are the âprotected classesâ continuing to grow? Of course they are.
Helen Keller could have seen that one coming.
Are private property rights continuing to disappear? Of course they are. Fundamental principle of liberalism by the way.
If eventually every âclassâ is protected by the government, where are we?
Of course it does.
This caveat.
Which public accommodation law did Twitter violate by banning Trump?
This is an argument that I am not making.
Public accommodation.
I know, I am. Your argument, from what I can tell, is that itâs ok for this but not for that.
1 Like
Yes thatâs the law.
What part of it was violated? Do you need me to post the contents of it?
Do we all agree that it is legitimate to be intolerant of discrimination in the private sector on some basis but not others?
It wasnât a caveat. It is the truth.
The elimination of public accommodation laws will likely not affect me because of a myriad of reasons⊠being a straight white dude is among them.
That isnât a caveat⊠it is just reality.
Still⊠get rid of them⊠itâs been enough time. Maybe people arenât jerks like they used to be.
The two are not mutually exclusive.
You are making MY argument for ME.
Cool
Cool.
No, Iâm really not. Did you not read my very clearly stated position above?
That, like not wanting to have public accommodation laws, has zero bearing on whether or not they should be forced to carry content that they do not want to.
They arenât going anywhere. Apply them.
Uh⊠yeah⊠it is.
A recognition of a fact of the world is not a caveat.
It is the very reason for it. âDo not want toâ is irrelevant.
We want to get rid of them⊠not expand them⊠right?
You donât want either.
Neither do I.
It seems like we should be in agreement here.