Regardless of who threw the first punch it’s absolutely insane that 15 guys jumped him afterwards.
One or two? Maybe even three? I’d understand. But 15? They knew from the get go that he had absolutely no chance to defend himself.
It wasn’t about making someone find out that they ■■■■■■ around. It was a classic case of a gang beating. Only gangbangers jump people like that with such overwhelming numbers.
You keep posting about their skin color like I care how tan they are. The source you posted said the kid who died threw the first punch, and I see nothing in the videos to contradict that.
And they had to know they were being recorded. People are stupid.
Gangbangers my guy.
Plenty of black people fight honorably or at most another guy jumps in depending on circumstances.
Those were gangbangers. They were all in a click. And that’s what gangbangers do. They use overwhelming numbers in street beatings.
Gangbangers are a result of black America’s cultural failings. But the vast majority of us do not subscribe to that mindset or lifestyle.
Gangbangers don’t care. A prison stint in an honor to those cretins.
Png…10 posts max from this one.
Now I will say this. Even though I do not believe race really played a role in this gang beating (they’d have done a black kid the exact same way) I will say that based solely on the optics of it we must treat it as a racial incident. It’s impossible to separate the optics from the racial mix involved.
It’s really really bad. These little piss ants make life harder for the rest of us people of color. Because they played right into the stereotypes we have fought against for decades.
It makes me sick. I would support every single one of them who participated being taken out behind a courthouse and shot after a guilty verdict. I don’t care about their ages. They were man enough to kill another person with their bare hands. They should be treated like adult males in the sentencing.
Actually it says “appears”
Footage appears to show Jonathan throwing a punch before being swarmed by up
I mentioned skin color because it’s unequivocal that boy who died is white (and skinny) from the other pictures shown.
What’s insane (and disturbing) is the savagery of what transpires.
Yes, you got it. The video appears to show the kid who died threw the first punch. No one is disputing that he’s white.
That’s gangbangers for you. They’re savages.
It’s the result of generations of fatherless homes and not a single lick of morality being taught to them.
A lack of civilization.
Woo hoo! Rocks and dogs! Thanks for yelping.
Maybe you’re saying something different here.
I’m reacting to the OP’s assertion that it might be a hate crime, not defending the killers. They should all go to prison.
On the flip side, it wasn’t very smart to confront a dozen guys who were already on a thugfest.
But yes, the numbers make this a horrible incident.
And, as the OP alluded, had the colors been reversed, the media frenzy would be as frantic as the beatdown the gang did on the victim.
The OP doesn’t make that assertion. That’s your projection.
From the OP:
Hardly an assertion. And whether or not the victim threw the first punch, the question still stands because of the optics of the savagery.
Suggesting that it can’t be a hate crime because the victim may have started it actually IS defending the killers – at a minimum, from the implications of the question asking if this might be considered a hate crime.
lol, okay. The OP asserted it might be considered a hate crime. A hate crime is determined by motive, which in this case appears to be a punch, not race. So not a hate crime, just regular crime.
LOL nothing.
There is no assertion in the OP. You are simply flat-out wrong.
And yes, your (and some from other libs) posts are defending the thugs. And that’s a wrong thing to do.
The OP literally says it might be considered a hate crime. I’ll quote it for you.
Gaslight someone else.
No, it doesn’t. It asks a question. That’s indicated by the curly thing at the end of what you quoted.
Gaslight? Never knew that’s what calling out someone’s blatant error was called.
You were blatantly wrong, both to defend the thugs, and then to make the falsehood about what was said in the OP in an attempt to cover for the savagery you tried to soften. Try as you might, that’s not my problem. Smarten up, lib.
Funny that you didn’t include the quote. 
The OP asks a question that I responded to. You should try it instead of posting about me.
The dead guy threw the first punch according to the OP’s source. If acknowledging facts is defending thugs, then so be it. I can live with your outrage. 
Hannity Community
The official community forum of Sean Hannity. Join the conversation with fellow conservatives on the issues that matter most.