Which is more expensive, jail a bunch until the rest get the message or capture and recapture them endlessly?
1 Like
Now why would you dare to insert some common sense into the discussion?
Additionally, requiring these lawbreakers to pay for their room and board while in jail by cleaning our roads, painting our bridges, mowing state highways, and other manual labor, will lower the actual cost of their stay in our jails, or until they decide they want to return to their own country
JWK
America’s wage-earning citizens have been made into tax slaves to pay for the economic needs of millions of foreigners who have invaded the United States’ border.
1 Like
We should probably also train them as revolutionaries and then send them back to topple their corrupt governments.
2 Likes
And arm them as they cross the border back into Mexico.
JWK
Today’s Democrat Party Leadership is infested with Authoritarian Revolutionaries, the same kind that took over Cuba and now rule over the people with an iron fist!
Has anyone here besides me see the latest?
Abbot is putting his plan into action, see: Lone Star State does it alone: Border agents arrest nearly 26,000 migrants at five Texas sectors in less than a week as Gov. Abbott defies Biden and puts them on buses back to the border
Thank you Governor Abbott for helping to protect against the Democrat Party Leadership’ s planned attack on the United States.
JWK
There is no surer way to weaken, subdue and bring to its knees a prosperous and freedom loving country than by flooding it with deadly drugs, an inflated currency and the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, and criminal populations of other countries.
Depends on how long you’re planning to hold them.
Based on FY 2019 data, the average annual COIF for a Federal inmate in a Federal facility in FY 2019 was $35,347 ($107.85 per day). The average annual COIF for a Federal inmate in a Residential Reentry Center for FY 2019 was $39,924 ($109.38 per day).
Great ideas! What could possibly go wrong? 
Requiring these lawbreakers to pay for their room and board while in jail by cleaning our roads, painting our bridges, mowing state highways, and other manual labor, will lower the actual cost of their stay in our jails, or until they decide they want to return to their own country.
Camps are cheaper.
2 Likes
I wonder why there are so many in this forum who find countless ways to indirectly defend the Democrat Leadership’s desire to fill the United States with millions of other countries poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, and criminal populations.
What the hell is going on? We have a housing shortage in the United States LINK, and uncontrolled immigration is very much to blame, see: Mass migration breeds housing shortages and political upheaval.
So why is the Democrat Party Leadership intent on encouraging millions of foreign nationals to flood across our border when we are having trouble housing our own citizens and caring for our own nation’s needy?
JWK
And how did that work out for Leonidas and the 300 Spartans? Slaughtered to a man by Xerxes for the benefit of another City-State.
And, by the way, Molon Labe does not mean “come and take them.” At the time that Leonidas said this, the Persians were already at the gates in overwhelming force. “Molon labe” is more correctly translated as “[you] being [already] here, take them” in response to Xerxes offering safe passage home if the Spartans laid down their arms. It is a statement of courageous defiance, and not a challenge to invade, the Persians having already done so. The Persians then proceeded to take them.
So, getting back to our own country and the here-and-now, is it not troubling how the Democrat Party Leadership is not only encouraging millions of other countries poverty-stricken populations to flood across our border, but actually assisting in their invasion of the United States?
But Texas needs to stop meddling in the biggest issue that controls its future and leave it all up to Biden.
I know that you won’t accept that policing of National borders are the sole province of the Federal government based upon a revisionist interpretation of the Constitution, and that you want to equate illegal immigration with “invasion” despite there being no accepted definition of “invasion” that would include the simple act of crossing a border with no hostile intent, but Texas unquestionably has no legal right to patrol or apprehend persons to determine or on the basis of immigration status. This has already been decided numerous time in cases involving Arizona state law and the unhinged Sheriff Arpaio.
Peddle that tripe to the thousands of victims of crimes committed against them by illegals. Here’s a goodun’ loaded with topicality.
.
Revisionist interpretation of the Constitution?
We are talking about immigration my friend.
Our federal Constitution does not need any “interpretation” with respect to millions of unwanted foreign nationals flooding across the Texas border.
“No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.”
So, it is not a stretch of the Constitution’s wording or its intent, that the current situation will not admit of delay, and that the Governor of Texas not only has authority to protect against a massive flood of unwanted foreigners flooding across its borders, but it would also be a dereliction of duty to not take action to stop the flood in its tracks. LINK
Additionally, Congress has been delegated a limited power to establish a uniform rule for naturalization. Naturalization involves the process by which a foreign national, who is in our country, is granted citizenship. Immigration on the other hand involves a foreign national traveling to and entering the United States. Are you unwilling to make the distinction between the two terms?
And tell us, what was the legislative intent of our founders delegating a power to Congress to establish a uniform rule of naturalization? What was the evil being dealt with when delegating the power in question? Was it to allow our federal government to force upon a State tens-of-thousands, and perhaps millions, of unwanted foreign nationals? The documentation tells us it was not!
JWK
The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it._____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)
All wrong. Have a nice day.
It is an invasion.
1 Like
Not according to those who embrace the Humpty Dumpty Theory of Language:
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean- neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master-that’s all.”
JWK
What will it take for American citizens and their families to realize their homeland is under attack? Witness the millions having invaded our border who now suck our pantry dry like a swarm of ticks and fleas, while our own needy citizens are made to suffer and go without.
1 Like
Why is it cheaper to send someone to a Holliday inn than it is prison?
1 Like
