Only about 400 of those 2,500 registration forms had serious issues.
A reasonable person’s take away would be that the safeguards worked as designed. Those with an obvious agenda would use the opportunity to try and prove non-existent fraud.
2 Likes
Musk is simply regurgitating Trump bogus fraud theories. There has yet to be one shred of evidence produced. Lots of accusations, but no hard evidence of any kind.
I think a lot of progressives would relish traveling the countryside in another Reign of Terror to hunt for “MAGA extremists”. Piles of heads for them are less offensive than being disagreed with.
The ballots in question aren’t fraudulent. They are simply missing the required 2-digit year suffix. A lower court ruled that the ballots could be counted anyway. The PA supreme court simply stated without precedent that the lower court order was stayed.
The Bucks County commissioners voted to thumb their noses at the PA supreme court and count the 420 ballots anyway. Bucks County favored Trump, and the senate vote was pretty evenly split between Casey and McCormick. It is very likely those contested 420 ballots will break the same way.
As much as you would like there to be, there is no fraud with that decision. The outcome will not be changed in any way. It is quite possible that McCormick might actually gain a few votes.
democrats are defrauding the system. the type of fraud does not matter.
makes one wonder what else they do in close races after the pizza boxes go up
In this case, there is no fraud. Everything about the ballot is legitimate, except the poor shmuck who filled it out didn’t notice the year suffix was blank and needed to be penciled in.
Get real. 
And that is exactly the problem.
Because the Bucks County commissioners voted to overlook the missing 2-digit year suffix from 420 otherwise legitimate ballots, we must therefore assume massive voter fraud is being perpetrated on a large scale across the nation.
justify breaking the law to get ahead in votes
you get real
The Bucks County commissioners aren’t attempting to justify their actions. They are simply thumbing their noses at the PA supreme court decision.
As I stated earlier, in Bucks County, Casey has a slim lead. There is no guarantee how those 420 votes would be divided. The decision has nothing to do with getting ahead in votes, as it will make no difference at all in the statewide 26,000 vote deficit.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t condone those actions, but I also don’t see it as a massive fraud attempt to take votes away from McCormick.
out of 5 million votes…you only need .2 percent to change outcome.
1 Like
And??? 
Figure it out…you’re data guy
There is nothing to figure out.
In my yard I have a single finch feeder that attracts a lot of finches. If I added a second feeder I could probably attract even more finches. Like your statement, it is an interesting observation, but so what?
You seem to be implying that simply because .2% out of 5 million votes could change the outcome of an election, then it must have happened. And if pigs could fly…
For those that been paying attention…if normal, and I said normal elections cycle there has been 1.3 percent rejection rate of ballots and then you have unusual election cycle where rejection rate is less then half of that. then 0.2 isn’t far fetch to change election outcome in very narrow race.
End of story…and that’s not debatable.
Actually, I had that very debate with @Samm
I also provided a link to you showing how rejection rates have been improving and will continue to improve. The differences between general election cycles and mid-term election cycles were briefly explored.
You summarily rejected my link and chose not to participate in the discussion. And now you are coming back with exactly the same claim, while expecting a different response.
What can I say except…
WOW! 
You don’t have argument when you get to pick and choose which election cycle is legit because it doesn’t fit into your desired theory.
You know who does that? Global climate change weenies.
1 Like
As I pointed out earlier. General election cycles attract different voter demographics than do mid-term election cycles.
I’m not picking and choosing. I’m simply pointing out that you are attempting to use incongruent population samples in your comparison.
Obviously, I can’t stop you from doing so, but I can say that any conclusions you reach as a result of that comparison would not be valid.
More experience voters tend to make less mistakes in their voting habits.
Yes you are…most of forum members see it.
Now I know you can’t let this go and insist of having last word…so knock yourself out.
1 Like
You have no data to back that up, and it doesn’t change the fact that you are attempting to compare two incongruent population samples,
I’m not picking and choosing anything. I’m simply pointing out the flaw in your analysis and resultant conclusion.
Most forum members aren’t even paying attention to this discussion. 
